2016 Election Thread Part Deux

#9,201
#9,201
hog88 said:
Did you feel the same way when Monica's boyfriend sold missile technology to the Chinese for campaign donations?
Click to expand...

For the 1 millionth time:

Clinton didn't give or sell anything to anybody. His administration loosened restrictions on technology exports, and a few things got out that probably should not have.The Republican House of Representatives conducted a full investigation and found that while some information was passed to the Chinese by Loral, it didn't amount to much. The CIA, in fact, said that Loral hadn't given the Chinese much useful information, and even the Air Force said that the material given to the Chinese by Loral had increased their capabilities only incrementally. Loral didn't apply for an "export license" to give the Chinese the data in question. They were working with the Chinese, who had a missile failure that destroyed the Loral satellite it was carrying. The Loral techies faxed them some data that pointed to some ways to improve the missile's reliability and performance. No one in the Clinton administration reviewed this data before it was faxed and they were never asked to do so. No "application" was approved. Also it's worth noting that the Republican House of Representatives elected not to pursue the matter as part of the Clinton impeachment. Learn to use fact not conspiracies. All of you Trumpkins got all pissy when Dems did things like this the Reagon and Bush but I now see it ok in your eyes now.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9,202
#9,202
carlos86 said:
I don't defend her. I recognize that Trump is the candidate that is being supported and willing helped by the adversaries of the United States. The thought of killing Assange is probably the first time I've ever agreed with what she said.
Click to expand...

carlos86 said:
For the 1 millionth time:

Clinton didn't give or sell anything to anybody. His administration loosened restrictions on technology exports, and a few things got out that probably should not have.The Republican House of Representatives conducted a full investigation and found that while some information was passed to the Chinese by Loral, it didn't amount to much. The CIA, in fact, said that Loral hadn't given the Chinese much useful information, and even the Air Force said that the material given to the Chinese by Loral had increased their capabilities only incrementally. Loral didn't apply for an "export license" to give the Chinese the data in question. They were working with the Chinese, who had a missile failure that destroyed the Loral satellite it was carrying. The Loral techies faxed them some data that pointed to some ways to improve the missile's reliability and performance. No one in the Clinton administration reviewed this data before it was faxed and they were never asked to do so. No "application" was approved. Also it's worth noting that the Republican House of Representatives elected not to pursue the matter as part of the Clinton impeachment. Learn to use fact not conspiracies. All of you Trumpkins got all pissy when Dems did things like this the Reagon and Bush but I now see it ok in your eyes now.
Click to expand...

:eek:lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#9,204
#9,204
volprof said:
Why are you taking this out on me? Your anger should be directed at the bone spurs boy.
Click to expand...

Is this the bull**** you are taking completely out of context?

Trump: Military suicides happen to servicemembers who 'can't handle it' - CNNPolitics.com

"When you talk about the mental health problems, when people come back from war and combat and they see things that maybe a lot of folks in this room have seen many times over and you're strong and you can handle it but a lot of people can't handle it. They see horror stories, they see events you couldn't see in a movie, nobody would believe it," Trump said Monday, during a panel interview at the Retired American Warriors PAC, in Herndon, Virginia.
Click to expand...

This is what you're hanging your hat on?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7 people
#9,206
#9,206
Good grief, you know it's a bad day for Trump when Michael Chertoff endorses Clinton for POTUS.

I mean ffs, this guy knows just how insanely bad Clinton is and he still trusts her more than Trump on national security.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,209
#9,209
The media in this country is ****ed

Ct31pFnXEAA1nUu.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#9,212
#9,212
AirVol said:
Another October Surprise? Video of HC demeaning and disparaging blacks. I wonder if she said it in her southern black voice.

October Surprise? Conservative Journalist James O’Keefe Claims To Have Video Of Hillary Clinton ‘Demeaning And Disparaging’ Black People
Click to expand...

WikiLeaks release tonight at 8pm

Tomorrow's press conf in Berlin proceeds. London speech by Assange has been moved to Berlin due to specific information. #wikileaks10

5,106 retweets
5,886 likes

Reply

Retweet
5.1K

Like
5.9K

More
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#9,213
#9,213
VolnJC said:
WikiLeaks release tonight at 8pm

Tomorrow's press conf in Berlin proceeds. London speech by Assange has been moved to Berlin due to specific information. #wikileaks10

5,106 retweets
5,886 likes

Reply

Retweet
5.1K

Like
5.9K

More
Click to expand...
*
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5292.GIF
    IMG_5292.GIF
    1.1 MB · Views: 2
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,217
#9,217
Septic said:
I do?

That news.

It's no surprise you don't have the intellectual capacity to understand that not liking Trump isn't the same thing as liking Clinton.





Dummy.
Click to expand...

Irony is in your vocabulary. Of course you support her, you're one of if not the most liberal poster on here. You're a good little boy and will do her bidding when the time comes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#9,218
#9,218
Septic said:
Good grief, you know it's a bad day for Trump when Michael Chertoff endorses Clinton for POTUS.

I mean ffs, this guy knows just how insanely bad Clinton is and he still trusts her more than Trump on national security.
Click to expand...

Probably because he realizes that even a woman who ought to be in prison over national security matters is better than a Kremlin agent.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#9,219
#9,219
tumscalcium said:
Irony is in your vocabulary. Of course you support her, you're one of if not the most liberal poster on here. You're a good little boy and will do her bidding when the time comes.
Click to expand...



Lol, your assessment is of little consequence to me.





Dummy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#9,220
#9,220
volprof said:
Probably because he realizes that even a woman who ought to be in prison over national security matters is better than a Kremlin agent.
Click to expand...

Like I said, you know it's bad for trump when the guy who prosecuted Clinton for Whitewater is endorsing her over the cheeto skidmark.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#9,223
#9,223
Septic said:
Lol, your assessment is of little consequence to me.





Dummy.
Click to expand...

What is supposed to be of consequence? You're a Hillary supporter. Of course people don't have to support one or the other. It's just that you're incapable, you support her. It's embarrassing, sure, but that's you. It's who you are.
 
#9,225
#9,225
tumscalcium said:
What is supposed to be of consequence? You're a Hillary supporter. Of course people don't have to support one or the other. It's just that you're incapable, you support her. It's embarrassing, sure, but that's you. It's who you are.
Click to expand...

Amateur. This pathetic display of condescension is coming off as forced and desperate. Slow down, take your time, you have to lay a foundation and build on it.

Sorry tums, you bring nothing of value to my table and your assessments of my politics are as near to meaningless as possible.

Now.. Back to the drawing board.





Dummy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top