2016 Election Thread Part Deux

#7,228
#7,228
AirVol said:
I remember when Dukakis led Daddy Bush by 10 at this point, anyone who thinks Trump isn't capable of pulling this off, you need to take off the blinders.
Click to expand...

There are folks in serious denial. The libs wouldn't be doing all this screeching if they didn't think he had a chance
 
#7,231
#7,231
lawgator1 said:
If it makes you feel better to keep insulting people and making snarky comments about the guy about to leave office, go right ahead. Won't make a difference in who wins in November.

Don't feel bad. The right continues to seem to be obsessed with somehow winning against, or delegitimizing, both Obama and Bill Clinton. Meanwhile, what little power you had left is rapidly fading.
Click to expand...
You guys are still insulting Bush and Cheney, almost 8 years after the fact.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#7,233
#7,233
AirVol said:
I remember when Dukakis led Daddy Bush by 10 at this point, anyone who thinks Trump isn't capable of pulling this off, you need to take off the blinders.
Click to expand...

At this point in the '88 race Dukakis had a 5 point lead in the Gallup poll. The problem with comparing this year to '88 is that the republican convention wasn't until mid-August. Immediately after the convention Bush opened up a lead over Dukakis and well you know the rest.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#7,234
#7,234
lawgator1 said:
If it makes you feel better to keep insulting people and making snarky comments about the guy about to leave office, go right ahead. Won't make a difference in who wins in November.

Don't feel bad. The right continues to seem to be obsessed with somehow winning against, or delegitimizing, both Obama and Bill Clinton. Meanwhile, what little power you had left is rapidly fading.
Click to expand...

Do you need a tissue LG? Are these guys being mean and hurting your feelings?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#7,236
#7,236
VolStrom said:
Just exactly who are you referring to?

White males, Republicans, conservatives, evangelicals, just who exactly were you referring to?
Click to expand...



GOP in presidential elections. And more broadly and more slowly, thr Senate elections.

The geographic areas that are the sources of power are shrinking, if for no other reason than demographics. And gerrymandering by GOP controlled state legislatures can't tinker with state lines to steak out guaranteed power bases.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#7,241
#7,241
1972 Grad said:
You guys are still insulting Bush and Cheney, almost 8 years after the fact.
Click to expand...

As well they should.

It may be a shock to you, but most people have enough sense to realize that Cheney was in fact the worst president, at least in the last half century, and that Obama is a slightly below average president at worst.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#7,242
#7,242
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#7,245
#7,245
Carl Pickens said:
Racist? The same photo could be used for Trump,Bush, Hillary, Harry Reid, etc. and the message would be the same......no?
Stop being such an oversenstive p****.
Click to expand...

Don't Trump all over my leg and tell me it's just some mud.

You must think I have the intellectual capacity of a Trumper.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 5 people
#7,247
#7,247
And in more election news...

Wasserman Schultz battling to hang on in House race, faces debate criticism | Fox News

Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz, ousted last month from her perch atop the Democratic Party, is fighting to hold onto her House seat and now is facing criticism for scheduling a weekend debate with a surging challenger that few voters may have actually seen -- while indicating she won't face him again before their Aug. 30 primary.

In the South Florida race, even the local Fort Lauderdale, Fla., Sun-Sentinel took a shot at Wasserman Schultz for setting debate “terms” that resulted in the incumbent facing off against primary challenger Tim Canova early Sunday morning.

“The 8 a.m. start time fuels the argument that Wasserman Schultz only wants to hold debates at inconvenient hours with limited viewership,” the opinion piece said, noting she also helped arrange Saturday-night debates during the presidential primaries that were seen as aiding Hillary Clinton.
Click to expand...
 
#7,248
#7,248
:puke5:We are going to have to listen to one of these two candidates for the next four years at least.
 
#7,249
#7,249
Obsessed said:
Social Media Patterns Show Trump Is Looking at a Landslide Victory

Current polls show the race for President is much tighter than it really is. Ann Coulter warned us years ago in her best seller Slander that Democrats and the liberal media always use polls to manipulate and discourage conservatives from voting. Thanks to social media there is more and more evidence that the polls are way off and if things stay as they are, Trump will win in a landslide!

It’s evident Hillary has a hard time filling a Union Hall while Trump regularly turns people away from his stadium and arena venues.

Now this – Analysis from social media provides additional support that Trump is likely to win in a landslide.

So how bad is it?
Evidence from ‘The Truth Division’ shows that if you look at social media, Trump is killing Hillary!

Facebook

Trump: 10,174,358 Likes
Clinton: 5,385,959 Likes

Trump has nearly double the amount of ‘Likes’ that Clinton has!

When comparing recent ‘live streams’ on Facebook:

Trump Live Stream Post — 135,000 likes, 18,167 shares, 1.5 million views
Clinton Live Stream Post —11,000 likes, 0 shares, 321,000 views

Trump is crushing Clinton.
Click to expand...

Think of how many people on Facebook won't vote or aren't eligible to vote...social media is controlled by teenagers
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement

Back
Top