2016 Election Thread Part Deux

[n_huffhines]

Man, you suck a political party teet? I thought you were some big thinker. Hmm

My point is that libertarians are extreme. I am not sure what you are inferring

 

[Carl Pickens]

Making a successful biz and managing an economy are not really related concepts.

Let's hand the reigns over to a truly self made guy, like George Soros...does that sound good?

Your appeal to his authority as a billionaire is a logical fallacy and not a good one.

Your more full of $*** than a Xmas turkey. If it was possible to get it all out ..... You could be buried in a match box

 

[Carl Pickens]

Meh.

The only one not upset with me was the guy I responded to. Ha

Now my feelings are bruised.... When everyone was down on you who had your back man?

 

[AirVol]

Wow.

Hillary Clinton Admits ISIS Was Created By U.S. Government | Your News Wire

 

[UTCVol]

Trump accuses Clinton of rigging debate schedule - POLITICO

This is some grade A whining from Trump.

 

[golfballs]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/do...Tracking_-_Core_Political_7.29_.16_FINAL_.pdf

Reuters now has Trump tied with Hillary. That's a 5 point swing since the start of the RNC.

So after two weeks of a significant Trump surge that now have him tied w Hillary, Reuters is saying their poll has recently become "skewed". So they're changing it to correct for "underreporting of one of the candidates". They're claiming it's because they give those surveyed the option of saying "neither".

The year of 'Neither': Why Reuters/Ipsos is tweaking its U.S. presidential poll | Reuters

Is "neither" not a responsible response, particularly in this election?

 

[lawgator1]

So after two weeks of a significant Trump surge that now have him tied w Hillary, Reuters is saying their poll has recently become "skewed". So they're changing it to correct for "underreporting of one of the candidates". They're claiming it's because they give those surveyed the option of saying "neither".

The year of 'Neither': Why Reuters/Ipsos is tweaking its U.S. presidential poll | Reuters

Is "neither" not a responsible response, particularly in this election?

I think it depends on the question. Evidently, if you ask which do you prefer, or which is best, about half of all people say neither. (In my personal experience it's about 80 percent).

If you ask who you are voting for, people sigh, and pick one.

 

[tumscalcium]

I think it depends on the question. Evidently, if you ask which do you prefer, or which is best, about half of all people say neither. (In my personal experience it's about 80 percent).

If you ask who you are voting for, people sigh, and pick one.

Does this poll only include Clinton/Trump? Forcing people to pick one or the other will definitely skew the poll as people will be voting for other candidates.

 

[golfballs]

I think it depends on the question. Evidently, if you ask which do you prefer, or which is best, about half of all people say neither. (In my personal experience it's about 80 percent).

If you ask who you are voting for, people sigh, and pick one.

It will be interesting to see then, because I would expect "neither" voters to be Johnson/Stein voters and would then make no difference in the results

 

[lawgator1]

If I were running, plank one would be a federal hiring freeze. Emergencies could be exempted but agency would have to justify each additional spot, and if non classified, would have to do so in open hearing.

 

[Orange_Crush]

If I were running, plank one would be a federal hiring freeze. Emergencies could be exempted but agency would have to justify each additional spot, and if non classified, would have to do so in open hearing.

If you won, you would make Obama king with your first and last executive order.

 

[golfballs]

Latest 538 delegate count

 

[Burger]

Latest 538 delegate count

That would be insane. That means Paul Ryan and Co would pick the president.

 

[golfballs]

PPD is a Democrat poll. It has Hillary up 5 in the latest release which represents a +1 shift from last month.

But have to to question the validity of a poll where 5% of those surveyed would choose to elect a dead gorilla over either Clinton or Trump

 

[golfballs]

Also, this seems a little lopsided in the wrong direction as well

 

[joevol33]

Also, this seems a little lopsided in the wrong direction as well

I'm voting definitely has ties to lucifer.

 

[carlos86]

Every time Hillary Clinton stumbles and falls Trump does or says something like this.

 

[Septic]

Gotta love unbiased mods.

Mods get to have opinions too. Ironically they must appear to be more like HRC and less like Trump.

 

[IBlvNTmWrk]

Mods get to have opinions too. Ironically they must appear to be more like HRC and less like Trump.

Wait... so you're saying that the Mods have rigged the way likes are distributed?

That would actually explain a lot.

 

[tumscalcium]

Wait... so you're saying that the Mods have rigged the way likes are distributed?

That would actually explain a lot.

I can't wait until Assange releases the mods emails.

 

[T-TownVol]

Gotta love unbiased mods.

Love ignorant posters more.......

 

[Vol8188]

I don't think he's crossed the mod/user line. :good!:

My issue isn't with him disagreeing, it's with him mocking your "rock solid" opinion

 

[IBlvNTmWrk]

I can't wait until Assange releases the mods emails.

There's rumors speculating that Freak started the whole "Gruden's coming" discussion to increase traffic... tifwif/jmo/iirc.

 

[UTCVol]

Every time Hillary Clinton stumbles and falls Trump does or says something like this.

From now on I'm just going to laugh at anyone who says that voting 3rd party is a vote for Clinton.

In reality, anyone who voted for the orange-faced windbag in the primary was offering a vote to HRC on a silver platter.

 

[apevol]

There's rumors speculating that Freak started the whole "Gruden's coming" discussion to increase traffic... tifwif/jmo/iirc.

I tried starting that rumor