How about naming the head of BLM as VP?Yahoo - Donald Trump to Name Vice President Friday in New York
I still think Newt is the best choice. Christie would be a disaster, and Pence is pretty uninspiring.
How about naming the head of BLM as VP?Yahoo - Donald Trump to Name Vice President Friday in New York
I still think Newt is the best choice. Christie would be a disaster, and Pence is pretty uninspiring.
That whole article is laughable and I stand by my previous comments that you are so desperate to find anything anti-Trump you will accept whatever is fed to you.
For instance, they try to make this picture as being anti-Semitic:
![]()
Because a Hillary adviser is being portrayed as having a large nose. Completely ignoring the obvious fact that Hillary, and her campaign members, often lie and it's a a reference to Pinocchio. But obviously you are so simple minded you accept the explanation it has to be bigoted because, well, it is.
You do realize that nobody even thought about the whole Star of David thing before Hillary's campaign brought it up, right? And you fell for it hook, line and sinker. Because, again, you are desperate for anything anti-Trump so you can see Hillary elected.
Trump's campaign is predicated on racism. C'mon, a wall on the border? I thought the appeal to lower to middle class white male was what go him the nom. Might as well acknowledge it instead of trying to keep it behind the veil.
Did you look at the link? The meme with the star came from a white supremacy website. Trumps campaign lied and claimed they made it.
Where else would I have gotten that picture from if not your link?
And don't try to make 8chan some sort of new Stormfront. A message board with complete anonymous accounts where people can say the most outlandish things they can? And the vast majority of your "proof" comes from a single user?
Reaching.
I agree with him. My thoughts on open carry have not changed and a political convention, protest, rally or other such venue is certainly not the place for them at all.
Were you trying to turn that into something political?
So I guess you agree that some restrictions on the carrying of firearms are reasonable? Even wise, perhaps ...
Aren't there more important issues to worry about besides a ***** star?
If you are concerned about this so much, why aren't you btching about Hillary using the N word?
No, as I have said before (and probably will have to again with you) I think the right to open carry is something that is well within someone's legal right if they desire.
But, as I've stated before, I always question the why and stupidity of those attempting to do so to make a point. And more often than not, idiots are doing it to prove a point which ends up being counter to what we would like to achieve.
I agree except I would add that it's not just themselves they can hurt. If in the bedlam in such an incident the police must spend time checking innocent people who are carrying but not a threat, that's a distraction to going after the actual bad guy.
The open carry guy's desire to play vigilante wanna-be hero creates risk for others.