2016 Election Thread Part Deux

In your fantasy land would your candidate repeal or revise sh**** laws that impede the ability to better one's self? That should be their job

Depends on which law. Some things can be handled by executive action (ending the war on drugs). Others would require working with congress.
 
Good. We are all better off if we can purchase cheaper products. It increases our buying power and standard of living.

You realize this manipulation is BS and contradicts your free market utopian ideaology...... Right?

You should discuss this in person with some fellas that work in manufacturing, while you sit behind your tenured teacher's desk. Explain to them how this is a good thing.... That the Chinese are actually helping them through their currency manipulation ...... Even though it's screwing them out of jobs.
The over/under on how long it would be before they started kicking your ass is :55
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
You realize this manipulation is BS and contradicts your free market utopian ideaology...... Right?

You should discuss this in person with some fellas that work in manufacturing, while you sit behind your tenured teacher's desk. Explain to them how this is a good thing.... That the Chinese are actually helping them through their currency manipulation ...... Even though it's screwing them out of jobs.
The over/under on how long it would be before they started kicking your ass is :55

What you're describing sounds a lot like welfare. Tax everyone so a few people can eat. If they don't work in manufacturing, other jobs will be available
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
What you're describing sounds a lot like welfare. Tax everyone so a few people can eat. If they don't work in manufacturing, other jobs will be available

How about making the damn Chinese stop devaluing the hell out of their money?

What other jobs are you referring to..... Specifically?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
87.5% more, but close enough. Still not as outrageous as the number trump claimed.

No it not as outrageous but likewise it's not racist to think black people are much more likely to kill whitey than vice versa.

It was dumb of him to retweet it but no way that action defines him as a person or candidate.

Hillary participated in a planned a joke about CP time. Worse?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
How about making the damn Chinese stop devaluing the hell out of their money?

What other jobs are you referring to..... Specifically?

Specifically? Whatever jobs the market creates with the increased cash available. And it's their currency. It's not harming you.
 
No it not as outrageous but likewise it's not racist to think black people are much more likely to kill whitey than vice versa.

It was dumb of him to retweet it but no way that action defines him as a person or candidate.

Hillary participated in a planned a joke about CP time. Worse?

So let's put yourself in his shoes:

You're running for president. You see a super controversial meme about race and murder, with a stereotypical depiction of a black man in the front. Do you repost it or vet it first?

And you'll have to fill me in on Hillary
 
Anyone who looks at this for half a second can tell it's made up racial propaganda. If you're retweeting racial propaganda, you're most likely racist.

The point actually still remains.

White people are almost twice as likely to get killed by a black person than a black person by a white person. Thats according to the numbers you believe to be true. Thats a number that doesn't need to be manipulated for "racial propaganda".

Furthermore, this one retweet doesn't define a person like Hillary's dumbass comment about coal miners. Is this really all you got?

Side note: Are you really up in arms about the "propaganda" from the white community given the current events? Seriously?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Advertisement





Back
Top