It all depends on if the costs of firing him are greater than the cost of fan apathy. South Carolina made the determination that it was, but they also were in year 5 of Muschamp and many of their people wanted him fired at the end of last season, but the buyout was stupid big. The buyout amount came down noticeably this year, and they still suck, so the decision was easier.I get that this is a bad year financially for the university, but I don't see how Pruitt would survive a two-win season. It's a bad year for the coffers of every school, yet that won't prevent numerous programs from making coaching changes and an eight-game losing streak is surely enough to show Pruitt the door if there's even a chance of a stronger candidate coming to Knoxville.
I get that this is a bad year financially for the university, but I don't see how Pruitt would survive a two-win season. It's a bad year for the coffers of every school, yet that won't prevent numerous programs from making coaching changes and an eight-game losing streak is surely enough to show Pruitt the door if there's even a chance of a stronger candidate coming to Knoxville.
I don't disagree, but I could also see Fulmer striking a deal with the powers that be to fire Pruitt if that meant he got to keep his job. He's always been good at licking his finger, sticking it up in the air, and figuring out which way the wind is blowing.Fulmer will never fire Pruitt, regardless of the record this year, or next. As long as Fulmer is AD, Pruitt will be here, because firing him, would require Fulmer to admit that he made a poor choice, and that is beyond the capabilities of his ego.
Yes and no here, I think.Fulmer will never fire Pruitt, regardless of the record this year, or next. As long as Fulmer is AD, Pruitt will be here, because firing him, would require Fulmer to admit that he made a poor choice, and that is beyond the capabilities of his ego.