They were 10-2 in the big 10. One of the best teams..... So that probably means 4-5 best. Top third of the league. One of the best teams..... Yet they were a very average p5 team.He said they were one of the b10's best teams. How far are we going into the B10 here? I would argue they were maybe 5th or 6th.
They lost to the 3 best teams they played and didn't play msu or osu.
Hell, if you're going down that road, the 3rd best team in the big ran train on the sec east champ.
Neither argument makes much sense IMO.
They were 10-2 in the big 10. One of the best teams..... So that probably means 4-5 best. Top third of the league. One of the best teams..... Yet they were a very average p5 team.
As for fla, anyone who paid any attention at all knows they weren't the same team after Grier got suspended. Horrible QB play. So yes they won the east, but by the end of the year they were maybe 6-7 best int the SEC.
No offense, but NW was extremely average.
It's because Stanford wants to play in a phone booth and Northwestern matches up better in that kind of game.