'16 GA DB Nigel Warrior (UT commit 2/3/16)

Status
Not open for further replies.
#3,029
#3,029
Go Fight Win said:
it would be unwise to bet on this kid going anywhere but Tennessee
Click to expand...

81oC5pYhh2L._SL1500_.jpg


11296525.jpeg


lit_match_by_thesmallwonder-d4hv75i.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13 people
#3,044
#3,044
Back in the Rivals100 now at #92. Funny how a month ago they dropped him out of the Rivals100 saying he was too undersized to justify a top100 ranking and now he's back. Did he grow an inch? Recruiting analysts are dumb
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#3,046
#3,046
GBO Vols said:
Back in the Rivals100 now at #92. Funny how a month ago they dropped him out of the Rivals100 saying he was too undersized to justify a top100 ranking and now he's back. Did he grow an inch? Recruiting analysts are dumb
Click to expand...

I also like how Guarantano was quite likely shut out of 5* status on Rivals due to a poor performance in a meaningless scrimmage at the UA game.

He absolutely crushed it during the skills section of the camp, but struggled to get in a rhythm with his receivers when inserted into the game at random and with a sieve of an offensive line protecting him.

Had he completed a few more passes or thrown a couple of TDs during said scrimmage, he's a 5* right now. No doubt about it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#3,047
#3,047
Aesius said:
I also like how Guarantano was quite likely shut out of 5* status on Rivals due to a poor performance in a meaningless scrimmage at the UA game.

He absolutely crushed it during the skills section of the camp, but struggled to get in a rhythm with his receivers when inserted into the game at random and with a sieve of an offensive line protecting him.

Had he completed a few more passes or thrown a couple of TDs during said scrimmage, he's a 5* right now. No doubt about it.
Click to expand...

And it wasn't even Guarantano's performance that was poor. The line was terrible and the receivers dropped balls that hit them in the hands. It's terribly political of those services, who were saying he was the best there during the week, to watch that game and blame his performance on his ability. He had no time, no open receivers, and dropped passes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 4 people
#3,049
#3,049
Aesius said:
I also like how Guarantano was quite likely shut out of 5* status on Rivals due to a poor performance in a meaningless scrimmage at the UA game.

He absolutely crushed it during the skills section of the camp, but struggled to get in a rhythm with his receivers when inserted into the game at random and with a sieve of an offensive line protecting him.

Had he completed a few more passes or thrown a couple of TDs during said scrimmage, he's a 5* right now. No doubt about it.
Click to expand...

Farrell is a doofus. None of the QB's had a good day because their line couldn't block air! He acted so disappointed in how Guarantano played in the game. If he'd have watched closely, he would've seen how terrible the line was and that given the circumstances, JG did the best out of any of the QB's there
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#3,050
#3,050
Wolfeman_Vol said:
And it wasn't even Guarantano's performance that was poor. The line was terrible and the receivers dropped balls that hit them in the hands. It's terribly political of those services, who were saying he was the best there during the week, to watch that game and blame his performance on his ability. He had no time, no open receivers, and dropped passes.
Click to expand...

I'm curious to know how highly ranked those OL and WR's are.

I bet there is at least one that is a five star in one service or another.
 
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top