'15 TX QB Quinten Dormady (UT Commit 6/9/14)

#1,328
#1,328
Tennkook said:
Still didn't stop you from showing your ### in that thread. :)
Click to expand...

How was that showing my a$$? If that is what showing your a$$ means then you don't hang around sarcasm much at all and need to go back to your blue hair Saturday morning breakfast at Denny's.
 
#1,331
#1,331
Tennkook said:
Still didn't stop you from showing your ### in that thread. :)
Click to expand...
jasonvol18 said:
How was that showing my a$$? If that is what showing your a$$ means then you don't hang around sarcasm much at all and need to go back to your blue hair Saturday morning breakfast at Denny's.
Click to expand...

Would it have made my post easier to understand if I made the font blue? :hi:
 
#1,333
#1,333
The irony that he's higher rated than gentry who everyone and their mother wanted and people are havin to be talked into believing he is good is pretty funny.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9 people
#1,337
#1,337
Bruce Wayne said:
The irony that he's higher rated than gentry who everyone and their mother wanted and people are havin to be talked into believing he is good is pretty funny.
Click to expand...

Agreed. Too many are focused on his Rivals 2* when he hasn't been evaluated but like that article said many say he is a Top 100 talent type guy. Think we got a good one and being an EE is even better.
 
#1,338
#1,338
LebanonVolunteer said:
Taking 2 QBs in 2015 with losing Ferguson to me makes sense. I think 2016 QBs could buy into that thinking. Taking 3 in 2015 IMO would be a huge negative recruiting tool for anyone recruiting vs UT. AK has UT very high on his list today. He fits our system perfectly. Tennessee has offered (13) QBs so far in 2016. Looks to me like they would like to take one. Maybe it does not end up being Kendall, but taking Jennings/Dormady this year and 1 next year makes sense to me. Also consider if they tried to take TG late, maybe one of the committed guys walk. I like what we have now and with the coaches taking them, I think they do as well. IMO TG will drop UT from consideration shortly after he heads home.
Click to expand...
To each his own
 
#1,340
#1,340
jasonvol18 said:
I'm willing to bet Butch doesn't want his QB getting 25% of the rushing yards or attempting that against SEC defenses. When you have highly rated RB's like Lane, Hurd, Scott and Paulk do you want our QB to be responsible for a quarter of our rushing yards? Hell No!
Click to expand...

Do you think a QB in the SEC cant or shouldnt acct for 25% of a team's rushing yards?
 
#1,342
#1,342
patrick said:
Do you think a QB in the SEC cant or shouldnt acct for 25% of a team's rushing yards?
Click to expand...

If it's the kind of offense that required a QB to or if your offense is designed for that then sure. But UT's isnt so why force it? Do you think Ala would ever have their QB accounting for that, or Georgia's? When we have the receivers we have and Running backs we have why would we need our starter to do that and take more hits than he has to?
 
#1,344
#1,344
patrick said:
Do you think a QB in the SEC cant or shouldnt acct for 25% of a team's rushing yards?
Click to expand...

If you do, you definitely will not recruit many elite WRs with playmaking ability. They do a better job of creating in space than a running QB does.

They also tire of not catching passes because the QB is not patient enough for a play to develop and takes off running.
 
#1,345
#1,345
jasonvol18 said:
If it's the kind of offense that required a QB to or if your offense is designed for that then sure. But UT's isnt so why force it? Do you think Ala would ever have their QB accounting for that, or Georgia's? When we have the receivers we have and Running backs we have why would we need our starter to do that and take more hits than he has to?
Click to expand...

Keeping the defense on their heels
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top