14 years

#76
#76
MG1968 said:
Fire alone couldn't. But you 9-11 Truthers always seem to forget that there were thousands of tons of jet fuel accelerating the fire. Add to that the structural shock of an object weighing nearly 400 thousand pounds slamming into the building at 200mph.
Click to expand...

That last sentence is lost on all of them. Then add the top floors crushing lower floors, crushing lower floors, crushing lower floors, etc all the way down.
 
#77
#77
Pacer92 said:
I get all of that. However, the jet fuel burned off in minutes. I can see the intensity of the fire maybe compromising the strength of the trusses that were involved around the floors where the crash took place, but for 1/10 of the building to generate enough energy to collapse the remaining 90 stories to the ground isn't feasible imo.

The bottom 90 stories had to be weakened for that to happen. The inner core was basically indestructible and it collapsed like a house of cards.
Click to expand...

I'm getting about tired of you concerning this topic.

You clearly know nothing about engineering and chemical fires.

It's getting very tiresome.

I never thought I'd say this, but shouldn't you be glorifying Putin or Russia instead of crapping upon a 9-11 memorial thread?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#78
#78
Pacer92 said:
I get all of that. However, the jet fuel burned off in minutes. I can see the intensity of the fire maybe compromising the strength of the trusses that were involved around the floors where the crash took place, but for 1/10 of the building to generate enough energy to collapse the remaining 90 stories to the ground isn't feasible imo.

The bottom 90 stories had to be weakened for that to happen. The inner core was basically indestructible and it collapsed like a house of cards.
Click to expand...

You keep tacking on "in my opinion". You are stating something that is either fact or fallacy, so you can't just cop out with "imo". If you have an expertise in the area of civil engineering or physics, then you can build an informed opinion based on the facts. But you aren't even presenting the facts correctly, so you are simply basing an uninformed opinion on BS.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#79
#79
volprof said:
I'm getting about tired of you concerning this topic.

You clearly know nothing about engineering and chemical fires.

It's getting very tiresome.

I never thought I'd say this, but shouldn't you be glorifying Putin or Russia instead of crapping upon a 9-11 memorial thread?
Click to expand...

Lol. I could care less of what you're tired of!

You are a titty baby. A whiner. And everyone in this forum knows it....

Add something to a thread without having a personal vendetta....or gtfo!
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#80
#80
bamawriter said:
You keep tacking on "in my opinion". You are stating something that is either fact or fallacy, so you can't just cop out with "imo". If you have an expertise in the area of civil engineering or physics, then you can build an informed opinion based on the facts. But you aren't even presenting the facts correctly, so you are simply basing an uninformed opinion on BS.
Click to expand...

What's your opinion based on.....being the writer from Alabama?
 
#81
#81
Pacer92 said:
Lol. I could care less of what you're tired of!

You are a titty baby. A whiner. And everyone in this forum knows it....

Add something to a thread without having a personal vendetta....or gtfo!
Click to expand...

The last I checked, sir, you're the one crapping upon a memorial thread with your whacky conspiracy theories.

Please don't bring me down to your level.

If you insist upon such things, start your own thread.

It's that simple.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#82
#82
volprof said:
The last I checked, sir, you're the one crapping upon a memorial thread with your whacky conspiracy theories.

Please don't bring me down to your level.

If you insist upon such things, start your own thread.

It's that simple.
Click to expand...

Like I said... :lolabove:
 
#84
#84
Pacer92 said:
Like I said... :lolabove:
Click to expand...

Like I said, sir, you can start your own thread.

I'm supposed to be extra nice to humans like you at the moment, so I'll smile and be nice.

Actually, I'll help you out.

Kind of like a panhandler who isn't really homeless, yet ask me to give them money, I'll help you out.

Look on the forum.

There's a new thread there.

Post your drivel there, please.

Man to man, please.
 
#86
#86
Pacer92 said:
So, you have nothing...like volprof. Just running you sucker to get some likes?
Click to expand...

You have a much better like to post ratio than me.

Maybe we ought to keep an eye out on you, sir.

You're awful fishy.

Anyhow, see the thread I made for you.

Post your drivel there now.
 
#88
#88
SpaceCoastVol said:
The odds are 100% because it happened.

I initially though of pointing out how truly stupid you look with this post, but thought that you were merely ignorant. There is a really good PBS special entitled "Why the buildings fell". It exactly why these buildings fell in the manner they did. Basically, the floors were clearspan to a central core and the skin of the buildings were in fact structural rather than a skin like on most high rises. The fire was so intense from the burning jet fuel that the metal did yield as you assert above. When the joists sagged enough, they pulled in the exterior skin and viola'... an implosion. Of course I will bet you think is was some sort of conspiracy in the US government.

Hug a member of the most peace loving religion ever today and thank them for their contribution to world peace. I notice all the remembrances from them on this dark day.
Click to expand...

And your explanation for World Trade Center 7? Did the steel yield there due to heat also... 8 hours later?

And assuming these buildings did pancake like you are suggesting, would the buildings/floors of the buildings had fallen at speed of gravity as they did on 9/11 or would they have first made contact with the floor below, buckled, collapsed, hit the next floor, buckled, collapsed, etc...?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#89
#89
DinkinFlicka said:
I think it's just containing the ****s given within imaginary borders created by men with too much power. Humans are humans, man. Loss of innocent life sucks, regardless of what nation you're from. Fact is, there are bigger atrocities being committed right now.

Basically, a stranger in Djibouti bears the same existential significance as a stranger in Wyoming.
Click to expand...

Say you like strangers in Djibouti? I never thought of you as that kind of guy....
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#90
#90
Pacer92 said:
There's no way that 10-15 stories is heavy enough to pancake the 90 other stories in demolition fashion. Imo. If it were dropped from outer space maybe...

Fire alone could not do that to a building of that stature in less than an hour.

https://youtu.be/E3EQV223Y-M
Click to expand...

It wasn't fire alone.... Don't forget the two airplane Molotov cocktails that slammed into the buildings at 300+ miles per hour
 
#91
#91
Rasputin_Vol said:
And your explanation for World Trade Center 7? Did the steel yield there due to heat also... 8 hours later?

And assuming these buildings did pancake like you are suggesting, would the buildings/floors of the buildings had fallen at speed of gravity as they did on 9/11 or would they have first made contact with the floor below, buckled, collapsed, hit the next floor, buckled, collapsed, etc...?
Click to expand...

Most people ignore this...there is no logical explanation..

https://youtu.be/8T2_nedORjw
 
#95
#95
Pacer92 said:
I get all of that. However, the jet fuel burned off in minutes. I can see the intensity of the fire maybe compromising the strength of the trusses that were involved around the floors where the crash took place, but for 1/10 of the building to generate enough energy to collapse the remaining 90 stories to the ground isn't feasible imo.

The bottom 90 stories had to be weakened for that to happen. The inner core was basically indestructible and it collapsed like a house of cards.
Click to expand...

That's because floor after floor collapsed down on the floor below like dominoes
 
#96
#96
Pacer92 said:
No way wtc 7 falls without being demolitioned. Jmo.
Click to expand...

So you think charges were planted? Is there anything you have to back this up?

Did anyone find demolition shrapnel in the aftermath?

Is your opinion rooted in anything substantial?
 
#97
#97
Just a sad day. I was at work today and one of my employees looked out of sort. I asked her what was wrong? She told me she was in NY on 9/11 and lost a family member that day. That hurt, sorrow, and sadness is very real.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

VN Store



Back
Top