'13 FL RB AJ Turman (UGA commit)

#1,052
#1,052
UGA insider said:
Nuts. I would take your O-line. That's about it.
Click to expand...

Ok so you wouldn't take Mychal Rivera over your TE? Or CP and JHunt over your 1 & 2 WRs. I think you must be one of the following:

A) Crazy

B) Dumb

C) Limited football knowledge

D) Outlandishly homer


... so which one is it, bub?


And I'll take Bray over Murray, admittedly it is close though. RB's is the only place you have us.


Also I think it is funny that you would call it "nuts" then say that you would take the largest offensive unit & heart and soul of an offense the O-line. Contradicting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,053
#1,053
Scotty's Flat Top said:
Ok so you wouldn't take Mychal Rivera over your TE? Or CP and JHunt over your 1 & 2 WRs. I think you must be one of the following:

A) Crazy

B) Dumb

C) Limited football knowledge

D) Outlandishly homer


... so which one is it, bub?


And I'll take Bray over Murray, admittedly it is close though. RB's is the only place you have us.


Also I think it is funny that you would call it "nuts" then say that you would take the largest offensive unit & heart and soul of an offense the O-line. Contradicting.
Click to expand...

Just calling it like I see it.

The UT O-line is probably one of the best in the country.

TE is close. I like your TE a lot but we have been fine with Lynch and Rome.

The UT WR's have been very inconsistent and have missed on several big plays. They are talented but we have been fine at WR.

Bray is just Bray. Again, very inconsistent. Murray has been as well, but I would not want Bray.

RB is really no discussion.
 
#1,054
#1,054
UGA insider said:
Just calling it like I see it.

The UT O-line is probably one of the best in the country.

TE is close. I like your TE a lot but we have been fine with Lynch and Rome.

The UT WR's have been very inconsistent and have missed on several big plays. They are talented but we have been fine at WR.

Bray is just Bray. Again, very inconsistent. Murray has been as well, but I would not want Bray.

RB is really no discussion.
Click to expand...

Bray and Murray have both had common opponents(Mizzou, Florida, and SCAR) he's throughly out performed Murray versus all three opponents. With gameplay and stats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,056
#1,056
UGA insider said:
Just calling it like I see it.

The UT O-line is probably one of the best in the country.

TE is close. I like your TE a lot but we have been fine with Lynch and Rome.

The UT WR's have been very inconsistent and have missed on several big plays. They are talented but we have been fine at WR.

Bray is just Bray. Again, very inconsistent. Murray has been as well, but I would not want Bray.

RB is really no discussion.
Click to expand...

lol "Bray is Bray" touche
 
#1,059
#1,059
UGA insider said:
Just calling it like I see it.

The UT O-line is probably one of the best in the country.

TE is close. I like your TE a lot but we have been fine with Lynch and Rome.

The UT WR's have been very inconsistent and have missed on several big plays. They are talented but we have been fine at WR.

Bray is just Bray. Again, very inconsistent. Murray has been as well, but I would not want Bray.

RB is really no discussion.
Click to expand...

Comparing UGA's WRs to UT's is a slap in my face. Seriously. Not comparable. UT all day.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 3 people
#1,060
#1,060
Scotty's Flat Top said:
I'll take our offense over UGA's any day though
Click to expand...

I wouldn't. Never in a million years. They have to be near or at the top in rushing in the SEC. It is no secret how you win in college football, you run the ball and play good defense. IF you have a good run game, it makes the defense a lot better just due to the fact they aren't on the field as much.
 
#1,061
#1,061
LynxVol said:
Comparing UGA's WRs out UT's is a slap in my face. Seriously. Not comparable. UT all day.
Click to expand...

Talent wise especially if we still had Rogers. But, Hunter has dropitis and Patterson can't run routes. I would take Mitchell off their hands.
 
#1,062
#1,062
secking said:
I wouldn't. Never in a million years. They have to be near or at the top in rushing in the SEC. It is no secret how you win in college football, you run the ball and play good defense. IF you have a good run game, it makes the defense a lot better just due to the fact they aren't on the field as much.
Click to expand...

Negavol, not a true fan, revoking your fancard, not a sunshine pumper. IMO.
 
#1,063
#1,063
secking said:
I wouldn't. Never in a million years. They have to be near or at the top in rushing in the SEC. It is no secret how you win in college football, you run the ball and play good defense. IF you have a good run game, it makes the defense a lot better just due to the fact they aren't on the field as much.
Click to expand...

More power to you. Georgia hasn't run well on good defenses this year. Our passing style of offense isn't the reason for the losses. And running the ball to win is overrated at times. Yes you have to be able to run the ball but having a good defense is a bigger key than anything. An average running game(which is what we have IMO) coupled with an explosive passing attack would win 90% of our games if our defense was any good this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#1,064
#1,064
secking said:
I wouldn't. Never in a million years. They have to be near or at the top in rushing in the SEC. It is no secret how you win in college football, you run the ball and play good defense. IF you have a good run game, it makes the defense a lot better just due to the fact they aren't on the field as much.
Click to expand...

When Neal and Lane have been healthy, UT has run the ball well. Agree to disagree on the offenses. If anything, I might trade the play-callers since I can never trust Chaney to stay committed to the run.
 
#1,065
#1,065
Scotty's Flat Top said:
Negavol, not a true fan, revoking your fancard, not a sunshine pumper. IMO.
Click to expand...

LOL, I believe if we had the same rushing game as ga, bama, or lsu then we would have at least 7 wins right now. In any level of football, IF you can run the ball when the opponent KNOWS you gonna run, you break their spirit.
 
#1,066
#1,066
If we had the rushing attack GA has we wouldn't use it b/c we would be in the no huddle or CDD would dismiss it as being ineffective. JK :)
 
#1,067
#1,067
secking said:
I wouldn't. Never in a million years. They have to be near or at the top in rushing in the SEC. It is no secret how you win in college football, you run the ball and play good defense. IF you have a good run game, it makes the defense a lot better just due to the fact they aren't on the field as much.
Click to expand...

:salute:
 
#1,068
#1,068
LynxVol said:
When Neal and Lane have been healthy, UT has run the ball well. Agree to disagree on the offenses. If anything, I might trade the play-callers since I can never trust Chaney to stay committed to the run.
Click to expand...

Chaney is a major problem. I also would trade Lane and Young off for Keith Marshall. :) Boy would do work behind this line.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement













Back
Top