Not sure what "mo" means. Way of namecalling with out breaking the rules?
At the risk of a dozen VN posters asking for me to be banned:
The team was poorly coached. They couldn't tackle. They couldn't block. They only played hard for a half. They looked ill-prepared for high level competition. They looked worse than 2010 in almost every aspect of the game. They got worse as the season went on.
Pass pro was MUCH better. Passing game before Hunter went down was pretty much unstoppable. The D did NOT get worse as the season went along but injuries on a very young and thin team DID accumulate.
And, if you would open your eyes, you would see that there was every reason to expect the team to have a rougher season than '10. They lost better upperclassmen than those who rose up to replace them. They became more, not less, dependent on underclassmen and guys with limited or no experience.
They took chances on schemes trying to maximize the strengths they had. Namely Hunter, Rogers, and Bray. When Hunter went down then Bray, it blew up in their faces. You choose the run scheme they worked on all off season because you want your pass game to set up the run. It didn't work great with Hunter in... and not at all once he was gone.
Tell you what, take the best HSFB team you are exposed to wherever you are. Do a lottery and eliminate 2/3's of the Jrs and Srs then go out and play with Fr and Sophs... and you won't even BEGIN to touch the difficulty of the task and schedule UT's coaches faced last August.
Record is one thing. Not sure how much that could have been helped. The inability to compete is another. No way Saban's teams LOOK like that. You have to believe your eyes at some point. It's not an exercise in freakin data analysis.
What do you do for a living? I manage people and develop teams to get complex things done. It is EXACTLY an exercise in analysis. Not just data but process, methods, standards.... a whole scope of how you move something from failure to success.
You NEVER compromise a standard for ultimate performance. You develop or accept a plan offered by a subordinate. You set a reasonable timeline. You watch the execution of the plan MORE than the results at any particular point in time. The execution of my most recent improvement plan resulted in turning over nine out 10 employees in one of my departments. I am probably one of the few people here with a demonstrated stomach for firing good people who can't satisfy a standard.
That is precisely why you can't judge Dooley without acknowledging what he started with, the plan he developed, acceptance that setbacks and adjustments would be necessary along the way, and the quality of the execution of the plan on a daily and even hourly basis. Unless you ARE Hart... you have absolutely no way of evaluating that. You watch games... mostly on tv, right? And you really think you have the information and perspective to make the conclusions you are making? Get over yourself.