the supply v demand argument just hasn't ever worked for you. I don't get it. You want oil to be a government supplied or overregulated commodity. How does that make any sense?
The day the market stops buying oil at the price being asked is the day that the oil companies have to find a way to make it cheaper. It's no secret that they operate off of a fixed %. As oil gets more expensive, they make more gross profit. Asking them to arbitrarily lower their spread is effectively socialism.
IMO free markets only work when consumers have a choice. But its not a choice anymore to use gasoline, everyone needs it. It's reached the level of food, water, and shelter as a necessity.
My arguement was that the consumer would be better served if refineries were owned by municipalities like the way potable water is. Or a cooperative where profits are shared among the people who buy the gasoline.
The current situation mainly benefits the oil companies. I'm not argueing that the price of a barrel of oil isn't set by the market. I'm talking about refining gasoline and bringing it to the consumer. It's a very profitable business, and with no new refineries there is not much competition. What is the choice for the consumer? There's not much pressure on them to lower prices, the consumers have to have gasoline. It's not a good model for the consumer.
