Recent content by nycvol010

Told you guys he was a fraud when he was posting stuff about jelks that anyone with a volquest sub could tell you was not true. He did turn out to be wrong about that, and here once again.

Good thing it is not true then.

:lol::lol: Give it up brother. Most of the time when Brent is wrong, it is because our staff is not expecting a commitment and they get a surprise (Santos). Brent is right about 98 percent of the time, and when it comes to whether or not we want a guy, probably 99. He is about the best...

Alright, well i well be back to this board in another 2 years. Until then, continue to fill it with false information.

No it isn't. Go ask Hubbs who talks to the coaches a hell of a lot more than you or I do. Ask him if we want Jelks. Forget me. He is the person to get a straight answer from.

I don't no longer post here because i wrote one article for scout 4 years ago when i was in HS.

I am 19, not a sports blogger, and i have 85 posts on here in 3.5 years, many of which came in this thread.

Really don't know. The obvious is Howard, Autry, Patterson, Meredith. After that, recruiting is recruiting. It feels a lot closer to Feb than it actually is.

No actually. I don't. Its not for lack of attention though, I can tell you that. I do know that as of now it is Vandy-UT. But i think that is pretty common knowledge.

The plan is Jelks. I mean, you got Ja'wuan James as a Junior next year, and a small chance he could come out early. Again, the idea is NOT to have to start true freshman. That, and I really doubt we are going to just hand the RT job to Alan Posey with not competition. So it is a need. It is a...

Its funny because if Jelks were a top 100 player on Rivals, everybody would think differently about him. Nobody would be saying any of this about him not being a take. In reality, our staff thinks of him as that type of player. I mean, Alabama has 1 O-Lineman in their entire class, and they are...

Honestly I rarely ever post here, so its not very important. I just feel like there has been so much misinformation about this kid, its crazy.

No. What is the point in comparing a WR to an OT? We want to take an OT in this class. Jelks is that guy. Period. What happens to us with a Juco WR makes 0 difference. If all of a sudden you see 2 more great DT's wanting to jump on board, then maybe we greyshirt, or even bump a guy. But it won't...

I think we have Autry and Jacobs, but that is pretty common knowledge. I think we are in pretty good with Sentimore, but he is a crazy kid, so you don't want to call it a lock. I don't think there is any situation in which we would have to pick between any of those three and Jelks, so the answer...

No, we would greyshirt some other guy. With the exception of D.J. Humphries calling us up and saying he all of a sudden wants to jump on board, we will take Jelks if we can get him. The situation you speak of would more be Shanks vs. Kirven or something like that.