Recent content by NEWDAYVOL

Now I think maybe I was right overall for thinking that KC wasn't high on the team from the jump and that she noticed some culture problems. She famously would state later in the year how this team likes to quit. Is it her, is it the team, is it both? I don't know. But my gut has told me time...

This is a wild thread. Do we suck? Are we average? Are we good? We are in the SEC. This is quite an easy SEC schedule (with no massively challenging OOC games) in my opinion. Many of the more challenging SEC games are at home. With the resources, NIL $, fanbase, etc that we have and a coach that...

"ugly early"?? Who are we worried about in the first 6 games of the season other than Texas at HOME?? We stressing about GT? Is that what we've become?? But Furman, Ken St., Arkansas, Auburn???

That's sad for our program and fanbase if we have to be high to have that optimism 6 years into a Heupel tenure. I really wonder what most of our fanbase thinks of our program. We melt down after every loss like we expect to win them all but do we really (expect to win them all)? I really wonder...

Doesn't look too bad. It's got to be 10-2 and a Playoff appearance or bust, right? I mean Bama (still won't be the same as old), LSU (after a disappointing year), & Texas (just doesn't impress me at all as an "elite" team) at home. No Georgia. TAMU looks like the only real challenge away. We are...

I beg to differ. When you had fewer bowls they meant a whole lot to the programs, players, and especially the fanbases regardless of whether said team was playing for a national championship. Many of those non NC implicating games....were the highlight of the year for those schools involved...

I'd be for that. That's a good fix. I like that idea.

I see what you are saying. That's a good point. Maybe seeds 17-32 play on campus at least for the first and second round. That would be pretty cool actually. Then we either get rid of the bowls who would have hosted those games or we let those bowl committees still organize them on college...

That's a good question. I guess you can't. If one opts out you just go to number 33. With only 32 teams even playing a bowl I think teams would be more inclined not to opt out since it would then be more of a privilege to go.

It's crazy to me to see people complaining about 16 teams and "well might as well just make it 64" and "what is the point of the regular season?" Even at 16 teams College Football would still have the most exclusive post season in sports. MLBs 12 teams in the playoffs is 40% of MLB. 44% of the...

Reduce the bowls down to 30. That is still plenty of bowls and takes us back to about what we had in 2006. Just keep the 30 best and most prestigious bowls. All bowl games will be part of 2 16 team playoff tournaments. To get into the postseason you must have an end season ranking by the...

There needs to be 16 teams in like the post season is for just about every other sport on Earth. No auto bids for conference champs. Put the top 16 in 1-16 (after conference championships). No special weird finagling and complex formula to ensure a G5 gets in (they only get in if they deserve it...

Haha. Yes, this thread has so many opportunities to go awry. No matter what we call it it is going to sound awkward and weird at first. But it should catch on in 30 years or so. :cool: I like Zoneball. The sport and the ball could be called a Zoneball (just like is done in other sports).

what would you suggest that we then call Football? Trump said that we should come up with a new name for it and let soccer have the name "Football". I will say it is kind of confusing. Basket-ball makes sense. Base-ball makes sense. How much does the foot make contact with the football during...

I fixed it.