Explosion in Boston?

Last time I checked, participation in a police force is not cumpolsory. If you can't apprehend an "armed and dangerous" suspect without killing him, that's fine... but you're not very good at your job.

Ok, I now realize I'm debating an idiot. Debate is over.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Again, what?

Doesn't make the officer a bad person, nor should they be prosecuted in all situations... but, ideally, you shouldn't be killing the suspect. If you kill the suspect, you did not do your job correctly.

Sure, maybe you killed him to save your own life. Maybe you killed him to save the life of someone else. But, if you were better at your job, you'd find a way to subdue the suspect without a casualty.
 
I heard through the grapevine that there's a subforum where you can discuss them good ole orange football boys... maybe that's more your speed?

I know for a fact that there is something called common sense...and you dont have any.
 
I categorically disagree.

I'm legitimately interested in what part(s) you disagree with because, of course, this is my personal view.

You agree that you ideally shouldn't kill the suspect, right? If so, and the suspect is killed, would you agree that the officer didn't do his job perfectly?
 
How so?

Shep said he was down. He was not.

Shep quoted the local Boston affiliate. Down does not mean dead...to me, and if you read my posts I never said dead and did not think Shep was saying he was dead. Your bias is thick.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top