jbeard82
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2008
- Messages
- 2,597
- Likes
- 0
I'm hoping I'm allowed to quote myself here... again, none of this makes sense when you look at it from the 30,000 ft view. Read the facts and put together your own puzzle.
Also: of course I didn't mention the OGs since we all know about that, but I won't count it as fact simply because I don't know them. (I am 100% in with them though.)
OGs come on at ~2:30pm with BOOM! and awesome news. Let's think a minute... ink is dry? Deal confirmed and done?
At 2:51pm Sports Animal puts on Twitter they have breaking news that breaks at 3:05pm. New is ONLY that there was a meeting scheduled, and canceled. Literally non-news. Not worth reporting unless we are still engaged, otherwise you would report that he is officially out.
Doesn't say anything about why which is of course the most important part. Rescheduled? Deal already complete and no need to meet? Met last night so of course today is canceled?
If the meeting is rescheduled for a few hours or days later this is suddenly a non-event. If it is canceled because everything is already finalized (last night?) then it is a non-event. It's so vague and ambiguous that it means nothing. But it is good for driving listeners and page views.
Again, why is the first leak negative? If Gruden were out why wouldn't you put out a press release or statement? Wait, didn't Ainge read something from Jimmy Stanton this morning on air (I didn't hear so I didn't put this as a fact) that they wouldn't address any rumors?
And shouldn't we be suspicious that Hyams and Hubbs -- again, both with significant ties to AD -- think we have 0% chance, essentially don't report anything, and then suddenly have some juicy news to report back to back? But never reported the meeting was happening in the first place and were claiming there was no chance that we would even be at the table?
One more thing... remember Hart's requirements of a HC. Which of the other candidates mentioned (Golden, Strong, et al) meets all of the requirements?
Take a step back and use some logic. It doesn't add up if you take the radio story and run with it. I highly doubt we get the $18 million back from academic donation without knowing why we were going to use it.
I'm out for a little bit. Soon.
I'm 100% positive nobody read this past the 3rd sentence.