Official Jon Gruden Thread XI

Status
Not open for further replies.
I think this tread dies if nothing is announced on or before the 30th, anyone still hoping the OG's are correct will fall off the wagon....not saying that means no Gruden just saying the thread will be full blown bedlam!

No way. This thread will live on forever. We'll be ready to hire Gruden for 2018 when whomever the hire happens to be fails.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
If Gruden falls through do we all disband and join other threads? Or do we start the "We are Butthurt we didn't get Gruden thread?" I'd post in that.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Pat Forde just said that Arkansas is a better job than Tennessee . . . .

HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA l
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
Well thank you. I promise I'm with you on wanting him but I just think he'll go the NFL route. People here just love to attack if you have a different opinion.

I'm tending to worry more about him simply staying away from coaching. If some of the rumors here are valid about him wanting max control, most NFL jobs don't provide that. I've read where he's looking at the Eagles and Jerry Jones would also love to have him, but he wouldn't have any degree of control with either of those teams.
 
I would say so...I am not an "OG" from bringing any info...but I will say that I have wanted Gruden since before Kiffydoosh was hired...

I am sure there are a lot of those. I was happy with Kiffydoosh until he bolted. I hope it happens this time. The Gruden thread really made September and October bearable on VN.
 
I'm cute without trying to be. More pertinent to the point, I'm trying to be logical.

If you're incapable of seeing the contradiction in your statement, then I'm not sure I can help you.

Your first statement:

"Nothing in life is 100% sure." Which logically equates to "100% of things in life are unsure"-- which would include your statement. So, your statement instructs us that we can have no faith that your statement is true. Thus, we have no reason to consider it.

Your second, slightly revised, statement fails in a similar manner:

"I'm 100% sure that nothing in life is 100% sure." Which, again, includes your statement, so you can't be sure that nothing in life is sure, so we have no reason to consider your statement.

It's not "cute". It's critical thinking, and logical reasoning.

I know it's contradicting. You know what I'm saying and you're trying to just be argumentative. Which is fine, I'll argue all day over something so stupid if you'd like.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement



Back
Top