Official Jon Gruden Thread VI

Status
Not open for further replies.
#6,831
#6,831
Good night gents. Mama is finally coming to bed and maybe she will see how down I am about the loss and give me some sympathy loving. I doubt it but an old guy can hope right?
 
#6,834
#6,834
tnvols72 said:
I still cant figure out why Stoops name keeps coming up in here. If he cant get it done in the big 12,then hes not getting it done in the SEC
Click to expand...

Would love Stoops. Never seen anything here that would leave me to believe he would leave Norman though. Wish he would
 
#6,836
#6,836
TNVolSoldier said:
Tressell can't coach until 2016...Our Fanbase never ceases to amaze.
Click to expand...
The ignorance from fans like yourself, amazes.

A Show Cause is NOT A BAN. It is simply the NCAA forcing the same penalty he would get if he stayed put, to follow him if another program hired him.

His penalty if he had stayed was 5 games and a bowl game if the team went to one. People keep reading more into the Show Cause than is actually there. They assume a good ding = totalled. He is not banned until 2016. He can coach anywhere he wants, as long as the institution is willing to forgo the penalty that follows him.

If you want to continue to argue, then read the damn ruling for yourself:

As set forth in Finding B-2, the committee found that the former head coach
violated NCAA ethical conduct standards when he failed to report his knowledge
of NCAA violations and in doing so, permitted football student-athletes to
participate in intercollegiate athletics competition while ineligible during the 2010
season. That season culminated in a Big Ten Conference Championship and an
appearance in a Bowl Championship Series (BCS) postseason contest. Further, in
September 2010, the former head coach falsely attested that he reported to the
institution any knowledge of NCAA violations when he signed the institution's
certification of compliance form, which is required under Bylaw 18.4.2.1.1.4.
Therefore, the former head coach will be informed in writing by the NCAA that,
due to his involvement in violations of NCAA legislation found in this case, the
committee imposes a five-year show-cause period upon him pursuant to NCAA
Bylaw 19.5.2-(k). During the period, which begins December 20, 2011, and
concludes on December 19, 2016, the committee restricts the athletically related
duties of the former head coach as follows:
a. He shall be suspended from all coaching duties for the first five games
during the initial year he is employed as well as any postseason contest(s)
during that year. During this suspension, the former head coach shall not
be present in the venue where the games are played and shall not have any
contact with other members of the coaching staff or any football studentathletes
while the games are ongoing. Further, the head coach may not
participate in any activities that are defined as "coaching," including, but
not limited to, team travel, practice, video review and team meetings. The
suspension from the first five contests includes all coaching activities
commencing when the team reports for fall practice through the
conclusion of the fifth game. The suspension from the postseason contests
commences at the end of the last regular season contest and expires at the
conclusion of the final postseason contest. [NOTE: Postseason includes
both a conference championship contest and a bowl game.]
b. Any employing institution shall file within 60 days of hiring the former
head coach (or, if he is employed at a member institution presently, 60
days after the release of this case), a report with the office of the
Committees on Infractions detailing how it will monitor the former head
coach so as to prevent a recurrence of the violations set forth in this report,
as well as information documenting compliance with the restrictions
imposed. Thereafter, the institution shall file reports every six months
until the end of the show-cause period, detailing its efforts to monitor the
former head coach. If an institution chooses to contest these sanctions, it

Page No. 21
__________
shall schedule an appearance before the Committee on Infractions to show
cause why such restrictions should not be implemented.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
#6,845
#6,845
Breaking news:::::


Cooke and EG can only offer our opinions. We don't know ****. All posts will be answered, but do not come looking for certainties.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 person
New posts
Status
Not open for further replies.
Advertisement





Back
Top