MNF: Green Bay vs. Seattle

#301
#301
LSU-SIU said:
It's a typical troll strategy, they are put in a position to look bad.... so they start with the, you are angry bit or the strawman arguments.

whoMe.jpg
Click to expand...

:eek:lol:
 
#302
#302
LSU-SIU said:
I see no anger I see a troll. There is no seeing this two ways unless your name is Pete Carroll.
Click to expand...

Yeah, a troll. I've been around much longer than you and have constributed much more, but I'm the troll. Oh, ok. He personally insulted me first, then brought up my family and seems angry, but I'm the bad guy by simply stating I can see it both ways. Some people shouldn't take this stuff so seriously.
 
#304
#304
Escape Goat said:
Thank you!
Click to expand...

Here is another one. If you see what he is doing now he is saying he sees it "two ways", this makes it appear that he trying to smooth things over but is not man enough to admit his fault. I have never understood people like that.

Ole well, time for bed for me.

Funny, I was going to the seahawks I guess, well not now... Carroll is a jerk.

Strawman+(light).jpg
 
#305
#305
tumscalcium said:
Yeah, a troll. I've been around much longer than you and have constributed much more, but I'm the troll. Oh, ok. He personally insulted me first, then brought up my family and seems angry, but I'm the bad guy by simply stating I can see it both ways. Some people shouldn't take this stuff so seriously.
Click to expand...

Sorry, but you HAVE NOT contributed as much as he has. You are right about the rest though. I personally assaulted your weak screen name.
 
#306
#306
zjcvols said:
The best part?

One of the sticking points for the NFL in the negotiations is that they can punish bad refereeing.

LULZ.
Click to expand...

Yep - that's where I have no sympathy with the refs position.

Jerry Markbrite was all huffy today about how all these replacement refs are scabs for life and they are taking jobs away from the real refs. You can't claim the integrity angle but then refuse a system that gets rid of bad refs and give good potential refs who aren't in the union yet a shot at the big time.
 
#307
#307
LSU-SIU said:
Here is another one. If you see what he is doing now he is saying he sees it "two ways", this makes it appear that he trying to smooth things over but is not man enough to admit his fault.

Strawman+(light).jpg
Click to expand...
He is just mad your name carries more weight on this board than his does.
 
#309
#309
LSU-SIU said:
Here is another one. If you see what he is doing now he is saying he sees it "two ways", this makes it appear that he trying to smooth things over but is not man enough to admit his fault. I have never understood people like that.

Ole well, time for bed for me.

Funny, I was going to the seahawks I guess, well not now... Carroll is a jerk.

Strawman+(light).jpg
Click to expand...

LOL. That one would be even better if it was relevant at all. I addressed both his questions. Haha. Try again, son.
 
#310
#310
tumscalcium said:
Yeah, a troll. I've been around much longer than you and have constributed much more, but I'm the troll. Oh, ok. He personally insulted me first, then brought up my family and seems angry, but I'm the bad guy by simply stating I can see it both ways. Some people shouldn't take this stuff so seriously.
Click to expand...

You are either:

1.) Using stupid internet trolling strategy or
2.) You are what he said you are

Take your pick, the problem is you won't quit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2 people
#311
#311
volinbham said:
Yep - that's where I have no sympathy with the refs position.

Jerry Markbrite was all huffy today about how all these replacement refs are scabs for life and they are taking jobs away from the real refs. You can't claim the integrity angle but then refuse a system that gets rid of bad refs and give good potential refs who aren't in the union yet a shot at the big time.
Click to expand...

I'm in the middle. I see both points, but the refs have to give a little, and the NFL has to stop being stingy with the dough.
 
#312
#312
As far as taking this "too seriously". Your damn right I do. I lOve the NFL. I'm not too down with having these clowns ruin a sport I love. Regardless if it hurts a team I hate. (the Packers)
 
#313
#313
tumscalcium said:
LOL. That one would be even better if it was relevant at all. I addressed both his questions. Haha. Try again, son.
Click to expand...

No you didn't. You start with the stupid, I see the call both ways BS. You are not addressing what he pointed out, as the rest of the sane people in the world viewed it. Let me see, they are going to be talking about it all week because it was a TD?

What you are doing is trolling.
 
#314
#314
Escape Goat said:
He is just mad your name carries more weight on this board than his does.
Click to expand...

Oh I certainly don't care about my "Weight" on this board. It's simply an interesting place to check out when bored. In fact, this is the first time anyone has called me out and and apparently teamed up against me. :cray: Not sure if I can take anymore. :loco:
 
#316
#316
tumscalcium said:
Oh I certainly don't care about my "Weight" on this board. It's simply an interesting place to check out when bored. In fact, this is the first time anyone has called me out and and apparently teamed up against me. :cray: Not sure if I can take anymore. :loco:
Click to expand...

Nobody is teaming up on you. Just stop.
 
#318
#318
tumscalcium said:
Oh I certainly don't care about my "Weight" on this board. It's simply an interesting place to check out when bored. In fact, this is the first time anyone has called me out and and apparently teamed up against me. :cray: Not sure if I can take anymore. :loco:
Click to expand...

Then take yourself somewhere else. :loco:
 
#320
#320
LSU-SIU said:
No you didn't. You start with the stupid, I see the call both ways BS. You are not addressing what he pointed out, as the rest of the sane people in the world viewed it. Let me see, they are going to be talking about it all week because it was a TD?

What you are doing is trolling.
Click to expand...

No. He had responded to another poster, may have been you, about me possibly being this stupid, and said -he is-. No they're going to talk all week because it was controversial. But this one just drives the nail on the head. Fans and folks in the media have just been waiting for a very controversial call to finally end the ref lockout. I'm sure they got one tonight.
 
#323
#323
tumscalcium said:
No they're going to talk all week because it was controversial.
Click to expand...

There is no controversy. The refs clearly messed up the whole freaking game and it doesn't matter if you are fan of either team or a neutral party.

The refs gave the game to the Seahawks, not just on that one play but a whole series of calls. Now usually it will even out, in this case it didn't.

Basically the game ended up being, why in the hell did I stay up to watch this moment.
 
#325
#325
LSU-SIU said:
There is no controversy. The refs clearly messed up the whole freaking game and it doesn't matter if you are fan of either team or a neutral party.

The refs gave the game to the Seahawks, not just on that one play but a whole series of calls. Now usually it will even out, in this case it didn't.

Basically the game ended up being, why in the hell did I stay up to watch this moment.
Click to expand...

Well, technically it is a controversy. I know how passionate you all are and as weird as it sounds, I do get it to a pooint, but it'll be controversial because the call on the field was TD when everyone else says it's a resounding INT.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement



Back
Top