'12 JUCO WR Cordarrelle Patterson (UT signee)

[UTVOL02]

1940 and 11th on average with him...1863 and 12th without

thank you :hi:

 

[OCIVol]

1940 and 11th on average with him...1863 and 12th without

Average points will be down this year because of SEC's 25-signee rule.

 

[smokeyhuntsgators]

No, it wouldn't be funny, Skeet! Come on, man! How funny would this be...Santos flips to Texas on Sunday, and then signs with us on Wednesday just to drive his point across to Texas for looking over him for so long? A man can dream, right?

I would absolutely LMAO!!lol:

 

[thunder5]

Average points will be down this year because of SEC's 25-signee rule.

On average 1940 puts a team at 11th....but 10th starts at 1965 so it would be very close to the top 10 anyway...

If things play out like you say with lower averages then the ideal finish will likrly put us in the top 10

 

[smokeyhuntsgators]

1940 and 11th on average with him...1863 and 12th without

So no chance we finish in the top 10 even with Patterson? Hmmm..I would thought that would have pretty much guaranteed a top 10 finish..All things considered that is still great!!:thumbsup:

 

[Jewbaccah]

So no chance we finish in the top 10 even with Patterson? Hmmm..I would thought that would have pretty much guaranteed a top 10 finish..All things considered that is still great!!:thumbsup:

Others have us at 8th if we get everyone we want...but 10-13 is more likely assumming we get 2 more guys we want maybe 3.

I have been told the rule is they take points from the top 22 guys. Thus taking 4 more guys would make a big difference re: Blanc and Bullock. I am not positve though.

 

[Bassmanbruno]

realistically we probably only get two of those 4 guys.

 

[smokeyhuntsgators]

Others have us at 8th if we get everyone we want...but 10-13 is more likely assumming we get 2 more guys we want maybe 3.

I have been told the rule is they take points from the top 22 guys. Thus taking 4 more guys would make a big difference re: Blanc and Bullock. I am not positve though.

Thanks for the info!!:thumbsup:

 

[bignewt]

Thank God for emoticons or you would be out of luck.

 

[Ericvol2096]

realistically we probably only get two of those 4 guys.

Which I hope people would not be upset with.

I honestly think best case realistic scenario we land 3.

Davis, Legget and Kirven.

 

[Tennakey]

Patterson, Davis and Kirven.

 

[Hickmc]

If Les plays him...

Surely you don't think Les would leave a talented QB on the bench just because the one in the game was struggling? Hmmm:good!:

 

[IndianaVolunteer]

if you had to pick, patterson or davis, who would it be? even though patterson will probly only play college ball for a year..

 

[flowd82]

if you had to pick, patterson or davis, who would it be? even though patterson will probly only play college ball for a year..

Cordarralle Patterson. One year or not. He is elite. You don't pass him up. Quality over quantity.

UT already has three 4* prep WRs committed. I would love to have Q.Davis on UT's roster, but I would not take him over Patterson. UT will have Croom, Howard, and Bowles as 4 year guys playing WR. It would be even better to have a 4th in Q.Davis. But I would take Patterson. The possibilities and potential of UT's offense with C.Patterson is unreal. UT shouldn't and won't pass on C.Patterson, even if he is just staying for one year.

 

[VolenteerSpirit]

:

if you had to pick, patterson or davis, who would it be? even though patterson will probly only play college ball for a year..

Not sure I understand the pick one thing.
If we can get Patterson, we can HAZ them both.:yes:
We are taking Davis regardless, he is all Voll and has a good attitude.

 

[Orange Blazer]

If we land 2 of the 4 we finish between 10-15. If we land 3-4 or 4-4 we are top ten easy.

 

[OCIVol]

Assuming we land Patterson, I believe we will be in the pre-season top 25. He's that good and will push our offense over the top.

 

[Orange Blazer]

Assuming we land Patterson, I believe we will be in the pre-season top 25. He's that good and will push our offense over the top.

Him and Hunter on the outside, Rogers in the slot, throw in Rivera and a decent running game. Scary good offense this year.

 

[LynxVol]

Assuming we land Patterson, I believe we will be in the pre-season top 25. He's that good and will push our offense over the top.

Whoa, whoa, whoa...

 

[l2dab16]

Assuming we land Patterson, I believe we will be in the pre-season top 25. He's that good and will push our offense over the top.

Will not happen

 

[head1]

Assuming we land Patterson, I believe we will be in the pre-season top 25. He's that good and will push our offense over the top.

Disagree.

Beat the snot out of NC State and maybe but the past two seasons do not add any reason for voters to put UT in the top 25 until they earn it.

 

[head1]

Whoa, whoa, whoa...

Can you change your avatar to someone already enrolled until thursday?

 

[atxvol2010]

Patterson will not instantly make this team a top 25 team preseason. If we beat NC State then we are in the discussion. To be a part of the offense, you first have to understand it. There is no telling whether this guy will know the offense the first game of the season.

 

[005]

Assuming we land Patterson, I believe we will be in the pre-season top 25. He's that good and will push our offense over the top.

I don't think we will be. But, we will be mentioned by analysts some, and if we throttle nc state on national tv to start the year...

 

[005]

TThe very best thing about all of this... is we wont really lose anybody, once again