skeeter33418
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Dec 16, 2010
- Messages
- 2,675
- Likes
- 2,379
nope. why would he?
some of the things that have been said are true, it just got blown way out of porportion. alwasy two sides to every story. im not trying to be cryptic i just simply cant go into specifics.
i will say this. if someone is a cancer or breaking rules dooley will deal with them no matter who it is. he kicked the best player and athlete off our team this year. he gave janzen every opportunity to get his stuff together.
dooley would do the same with bray,hunter, rogers or anyone else on the team.
We had one bad game and it is the end of the world. And yes no matter how revisionist folks try to get that was the only truly bad game we had this year. other games we lost we should have lost and in most cases showed up better than we should have. The Vandy game was not good but not bad either.Glad we can see eye to eye on at least one thing :hi: I like your opinion, just have lost all faith in this staff after the abysmal showing last game. Well, offensive staff plus HC. I really like our defensive staff.
After the Kentucky game, Tauren said they didn't want to be there. Austin said people were more concerned about themselves than the team. Malik said he was so glad he came to Tennessee and that Dooley was a great coach who was going to have a lot of success.
They may all acknowledge the same facts, but that tone is vastly, vastly different.
We had one bad game and it is the end of the world. And yes no matter how revisionist folks try to get that was the only truly bad game we had this year. other games we lost we should have lost and in most cases showed up better than we should have. The Vandy game was not good but not bad either.
What exactly is there to be positive about? Recruits still have to be coached.
After the Kentucky game, Tauren said they didn't want to be there. Austin said people were more concerned about themselves than the team. Malik said he was so glad he came to Tennessee and that Dooley was a great coach who was going to have a lot of success.
They may all acknowledge the same facts, but that tone is vastly, vastly different.
We got a lot of young guys that didn't put in the work...there just young they don't know no better...right now they don't have a clue
Malik Jackson & Prentiss Waggner Postgame Interviews (11/26/11) - SpadeSocial
We got a lot of young guys that didn't put in the work...they're just young they don't know no better...right now they don't have a clue
Malik Jackson & Prentiss Waggner Postgame Interviews (11/26/11) - SpadeSocial
Positives AJ, Maggitt, Randolph, Eric Gordon to me looks like he is about to really bloom as the nickle back, Couch, The passing game looked damn near unstoppabale till J hunter went down. Pass blocking did improve a lot, if you deny that you are a intentionally negative jerk. There were positives, like I said none of you anti Dooley guys will EVER admit it.
Like I said, facts were similar, tone was different. Malik talked like he was happy to be involved with the team that the issues were a bump in the road that was going to be fixed. Tauren and Austin didn't have the positive framing. Wouldn't surprise me to hear the attitudes are quite different.
We had one bad game and it is the end of the world. And yes no matter how revisionist folks try to get that was the only truly bad game we had this year. other games we lost we should have lost and in most cases showed up better than we should have. The Vandy game was not good but not bad either.