Penn State scandal (merged)

Man, I'll be glad when the "octogenarians knowing about pedophilia" argument is over with. Sure is wasting a lot of bandwidth.

Has anyone on the entire board agreed with him one time? Well, rmsmith probably did while he was describing his showers with strange men as an adolescent.
 
When I replied to your post, you referenced a article about octogenarian's. Talking about the entire PSU situation. Paterno being at PSU. Paterno being a octogenarian at this present time. Therefore he would be in this group. Got it so far?

Thereby meaning that you would believe that Paterno was not aware that things like this occurred. I merely stated that Paterno was not in his 80's in 1998 when this happened! If you can't use deductive reasoning and figure this out, then you sir have a problem.

First of all, I NEVER referenced any article talking about octogenarians. You are just making more sh_t up and digging a deeper hole. Now, if thats what I said, feel free to scroll back those 2-3 pages to find my quote, and post the link here... if thats not too much trouble. lol
 
Found this little tidbit Lawvol. Wonder what they say about this?
Happened in 2006

LOL Wow, thats explosive. OK, I agree.... hang Paterno. Just haul him out of his Barcalounger and string him up to a lightpost. No jury, no trial, just kill that bastard!

Seriously, you guys are really really really reaching here. If thats the best you can do then you need to take the scissors to your internet connection.
 
First of all, I NEVER referenced any article talking about octogenarians. You are just making more sh_t up and digging a deeper hole. Now, if thats what I said, feel free to scroll back those 2-3 pages to find my quote, and post the link here... if thats not too much trouble. lol

The article were the threads you mentioned you didn't want to go over. Wouldn't someone have had to have referenced the material from an article to even go that route and have it brought up at some point?
 
The article were the threads you mentioned you didn't want to go over. Wouldn't someone have had to have referenced the material from an article to even go that route and have it brought up at some point?

OK, so let me get this straight. You accused me of stating that Paterno "was in his 80's" in 1998, but you cant find the post/link. Then, you accused me of making reference to an "article" about pedophilia/octos, but now you cant find that either, and are presupposing that the statements I made, which you did not understand in the first place, must have come from an article that "someone" referenced in a previous post. And you guys wonder why this is a nonstop laughfest!
 
OK, so let me get this straight. You accused me of stating that Paterno "was in his 80's" in 1998, but you cant find the post/link. Then, you accused me of making reference to an "article" about pedophilia/octos, but now you cant find that either, and are presupposing that the statements I made, which you did not understand in the first place, must have come from an article that "someone" referenced in a previous post. And you guys wonder why this is a nonstop laughfest!
To stop all of this, you may need to go back and read what I actually replied to your thread and what you've turned it in to.
 
:eek:hmy: :eek:lol:

Hman, I dont give a flying frick if any of you highly limited individuals agree with me or not. My read on most of you is that your entire logic tree looks like a $10 Dogwood in a Home Depot parking lot. If any of you have difficulty interpreting that comment, I'll be glad to add another layer. lol
 
To stop all of this, you may need to go back and read what I actually replied to your thread and what you've turned it in to.

I reposted what you said. You never provided any substance to your statements in the form of links, copy and pastes, nothing, So basically you are FOS. I guess I gave you more credit.
 
Hman, I dont give a flying frick if any of you highly limited individuals agree with me or not. My read on most of you is that your entire logic tree looks like a $10 Dogwood in a Home Depot parking lot. If any of you have difficulty interpreting that comment, I'll be glad to add another layer. lol

May you be infested with the fleas of a 1000 camels!
 
Mods, I vote that it's about time to end Darwindumbass's posting privileges. Not that my vote means anything, but I'd like to note that on the record.
 
Hman, I dont give a flying frick if any of you highly limited individuals agree with me or not. My read on most of you is that your entire logic tree looks like a $10 Dogwood in a Home Depot parking lot. If any of you have difficulty interpreting that comment, I'll be glad to add another layer. lol
My read on you, based on your debating skills, is you are still in high school or have just recently gotten out of high school. Amirite?
 
Mods, I vote that it's about time to end Darwindumbass's posting privileges. Not that my vote means anything, but I'd like to note that on the record.

But think of all the comedy we would miss out on. Clowns always made me laugh.
 
No you didnt, thats another blatant LIE! OK, scroll back the 2-3 pages to find those comments, and just simply paste them here and I will apologize and come mow your yard next week. lol

If I didn't use one of your posts, then how did you know to reply to me? Funny you say I didn't use anything you said!
 
But think of all the comedy we would miss out on. Clowns always made me laugh.

I grew tired of it after about 2 pages. The rest is just stupid; Darwindumbass has about as much intelligence as this garbage can in the room I'm in.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top