Just a quick poll

I ...

  • Total voters
    0
  • Poll closed .
#176
#176
NEOCON said:
The poll gave a Republican majority?

You didn;t get that right?

That goes with my statement.

Are you in a community college?
Click to expand...

It's a slight majority. That isn't what you're saying. Your poll reflects the same sort of relationship (given the difference in sample size) reflected in the CNN poll, yet you are

1) too ignorant to even realize it

and

2) ridiculously championing a single digit difference in percentages of a less than 15,000 person sample as backing up your claims.
 
#177
#177
IPorange said:
Prove it. That is what scientists are about. Evidence. You have none.

You have decided most media is biased, and your evidence is anything that doesn't report what you expect to see. Awesome.
Click to expand...

Wow. Im sorry IP. I always thought you were a bright guy but I guess I was wrong.

The Poll AGREES with me. The point I am making is that if the NYT agrees with me that the points are even greater. Can you atleast understand what I am saying?

Both CNN and NYT's have done polls and AGREE with me. Neither are Foxnews. Neither are conservative.

How is this difficult?
 
#178
#178
MG1968 said:
wonder how many of those folks would vote for him again? In 2008 it was easy to vote against McCain and vote for Obama, now that Obama actually has a track record, I'll bet that a lot of those in the upper-middle class bracket who voted for him then, won't vote for him in 2012.
Click to expand...

Depends on where the Republicans decide to take their direction and candidacy in 2012.

I could be swayed to vote R this time around, but I have a feeling they'll be moving further right and I'll likely end up voting Democrat again.
 
#180
#180
NEOCON said:
Wow. Im sorry IP. I always thought you were a bright guy but I guess I was wrong.

The Poll AGREES with me. The point I am making is that if the NYT agrees with me that the points are even greater. Can you atleast understand what I am saying?

Both CNN and NYT's have done polls and AGREE with me. Neither are Foxnews. Neither are conservative.

How is this difficult?
Click to expand...

You've made it quite clear you think all wealthy people vote the same way. They don't it's basically split. I don't know why you think you can bully your way out of that. Anyone can read this thread see the case you've been making.
 
#182
#182
Over 200k JOBS it's almost a 30 point difference on the CNN poll. That's a big deal.


I don't consider 100K wealthy either. I do feel nearly 75% of wealthy voters vote Republican though.

CNN (while it stops at only 200K) seems to think so too.
 
#184
#184
NEOCON said:
Over 200k JOBS it's almost a 30 point difference on the CNN poll. That's a big deal.


I don't consider 100K wealthy either. I do feel nearly 75% of wealthy voters vote Republican though.

CNN (while it stops at only 200K) seems to think so too.
Click to expand...

I dont' know what CNN poll you are looking at. It isn't the 2006 exit poll that was linked in your article:

CNN.com - Elections 2006
 
#185
#185
milohimself said:
Depends on where the Republicans decide to take their direction and candidacy in 2012.

I could be swayed to vote R this time around, but I have a feeling they'll be moving further right and I'll likely end up voting Democrat again.
Click to expand...

You have a better beat on it that I do then. I can't tell which way the party is headed.

I'm not shocked at all of the number of 100K people that voted for Obama. Tiredness of Bush, a GOP candidate that quite frankly was impossible to get excited about, a yearn for the booming 90s, and a candidate painted as the modern JFK. Throw in a tendency of libery social conscience and policies of this bunch, and there you have it.
 
#187
#187
NEOCON said:
Over 200k JOBS it's almost a 30 point difference on the CNN poll. That's a big deal.


I don't consider 100K wealthy either. I do feel nearly 75% of wealthy voters vote Republican though.

CNN (while it stops at only 200K) seems to think so too.
Click to expand...

You guys aren't arguing the simple fact that a larger number of people making more than $100k vote Republican, you're arguing the margin by which it happens.

Over $200k, you're right, it's pretty significant, but not quite so much so from $100k-200k.
 
#188
#188
NEOCON said:
:eek:k:

I've got bad eathr here right now. Will have to log back on later.
Click to expand...

All three of those cities are in the top 100 in median household income. Those cities comprise the bulk of Kansas' 3rd Congressional District. The only Democratic Congressman from Kansas represented that district from January 3, 1999-January 3, 2011.
 
#190
#190
NEOCON, do you base life success and happiness on income?

I know many people that are happy and successful that are making <50k. Most of them are probably doing more good in the world than you are. Why is it you think these people shouldn't be allowed to vote?

Elitist.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
 
#191
#191
Far more often than not, people who like to talk about how much money they make are confused about the definition of success. These people are the largest faction of what we commonly call the nouveau riche. Another common trait of this group is the idea that having money automatically exudes class yet in reality, the money has nothing to do with class. Most anyone with money AND class will never tell you how much they have or make and will tell you it is none of your business if you ask them what they earn. Not picking on you NEOCON, but you seem to equate ideology with financial success and that is just not the case. Being a republican has nothing to do with it. The reason those that make > 100000 vote more often with the republicans is generally because republicans are less likely to tax the rich. That is where the similarites between someone like NEOCON and someone like Martha Ingram end. With all due respect to NEOCON, who has obviously worked very hard to achieve his "status" among the rich, he is much more concerned with that aspect of it than your daily visitors to the Honors Club. JMHO
 
#192
#192
whatadifferenceadaymake.jpg


Help your Democratic acquaintances explain
their voting. They can now pick their reasons
from this list:

1. I voted Democrat because I believe oil
companies' profits of 4% on a gallon of gas
are obscene, but the government taxing
the same gallon of gas at 15% isn't.

2. I voted Democrat because I believe the
government will do a better job of spending
the money I earn than I would.

3. I voted Democrat because Freedom of
Speech is fine as long as nobody is offended
by it.

4. I voted Democrat because I'm way too
irresponsible to own a gun, and I know that
my local police are all I need to protect me
from murderers and thieves.

5. I voted Democrat because I believe that
people who can't tell us if it will rain on Friday
can tell us that the polar ice caps will melt
away in ten years if I don't start driving a
Prius.

6. I voted Democrat because I'm not concerned
about millions of babies being aborted so long as
we keep all death row inmates alive.

7. I voted Democrat because I think illegal aliens
have a right to free health care, education, and
Social Security benefits.

8. I voted Democrat because I believe that
business should not be allowed to make profits
for themselves. They need to break even and
give the rest away to the government for
redistribution as the Democrats see fit.

9. I voted Democrat because I believe liberal
judges need to rewrite the Constitution every
few days to suit some fringe kooks who would
never get their agendas past the voters.

10. I voted Democrat because I think that it's
better to pay billions to people who hate us for
their oil, but not drill our own because it might
upset some endangered beetle or gopher.

11. I voted Democrat because while we live in
the greatest, most wonderful country in the
world, I was promised "HOPE AND CHANGE".

DCRATS.jpg
 
#193
#193
I choose option 6, and may I modify option 7 in the following manner:

I voted Democrat because I think illegal aliens should have the same access to health care and education that American citizens in their same earnings brackets do.

Thank you for accommodating.
 
#194
#194
shortgameVol said:
Far more often than not, people who like to talk about how much money they make are confused about the definition of success. These people are the largest faction of what we commonly call the nouveau riche. Another common trait of this group is the idea that having money automatically exudes class yet in reality, the money has nothing to do with class. Most anyone with money AND class will never tell you how much they have or make and will tell you it is none of your business if you ask them what they earn. Not picking on you NEOCON, but you seem to equate ideology with financial success and that is just not the case. Being a republican has nothing to do with it. The reason those that make > 100000 vote more often with the republicans is generally because republicans are less likely to tax the rich. That is where the similarites between someone like NEOCON and someone like Martha Ingram end. With all due respect to NEOCON, who has obviously worked very hard to achieve his "status" among the rich, he is much more concerned with that aspect of it than your daily visitors to the Honors Club. JMHO
Click to expand...

In no way do I feel I am more imprortant than someone who is making 35K a year and has worked the last 5 straight years to feed their family and done the best they can. Money does not make a man. The man makes the money.

I do though feel the person making 35K who is supprting their family is more important than the 30 year old living off welfare who believes the world owes them something.

I do believe the person making 35K is more important than the college kid who has not stepped off campus yet and begun supporting themselves.

All workers matter. All workers are equal. Incomes only changes income. Society structure pays me more than a fast food manager and less than a NBA superstar.

Personally, if I could make the same living I'd much rather be slinging pizzas as Little Caesars. One of the only jobs I ever liked.
 
#195
#195
My name is B. Barry Soetoro Davis Barak
Barrack Barack Hussein Obama. My entire
life is a lie and a criminal fabrication.

Amazingly, although I lived in abject fear
of being exposed, I've found that the
communist media is willingly to cover-up
any and all holes in my Swiss cheese life
of prevarication. Here's what I told you
I would do just to get elected:

1. Get rid of Gitmo.

2. End deficit spending.

3. Give everyone free healthcare.

4. Be the most transparent administration
in history.

5. End all wars immediately.

What I did was:

1. Ruin the economy.

2. Pay off the unions for getting me
elected with fake stimulus.

3. Destroy the housing market, oil
industry and coal industries.

4. Raise gas prices over $4 heading
toward $6 +.

5. Start a third stupid war for no purpose.

6. Supported moslems and desecrated
Christianity.

7. Stuck it to whitey by using the justice
department to implement blacks are better
policy.

8. Failed to defend our borders.

9. Attacked patriotic citizens called pejorative
'tea baggers' in an attempt to crush America
and destroy it once and for all.

10. Apologized all over the world to third-
world banana dictators and slipped them
billions of your tax dollars to support
moslem theocracy.

11. Lived like a playboy king at your expense
playing golf, vacationing every week and
eating $200 / lb steak while you eat dog food,
lose your homes, and die waiting for Obamacare
surgeries.

ODL49.png


Fooled you, didn't I!
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top