Kingston Vol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 15, 2009
- Messages
- 26,325
- Likes
- 28,819
Lawrence Franks--the pro game is different than the college game, including recruiting and managing the players on a daily basis. I question why? Besides he's 40, coached the Nets and asstd under O'neill? What are people basing their opinions on?
Lawrence Franks--the pro game is different than the college game, including recruiting and managing the players on a daily basis. I question why? Besides he's 40, coached the Nets and asstd under O'neill? What are people basing their opinions on?
Lawrence Franks--the pro game is different than the college game, including recruiting and managing the players on a daily basis. I question why? Besides he's 40, coached the Nets and asstd under O'neill? What are people basing their opinions on?
Umm... he is widely respected amongst players and his peers. He took a geriatric Nets team to the division title and the playoffs a couple times. He still managed to keep the team from completely tanking when the ownership decided they didn't want to spend money anymore. He has recruited at the college level. I could go on.
I didn't ask for someone to toss out things you have read. Did his players respect him when he started 0-16? (or something like that) Taking an NBA franchise on a run for W's doesn't mean anything to me as far as the college game and his specific skill set he brings as a HC at UT. If he should be HC, what's he going to run? Basic O principles? D? Big man focus? Guard focus? Traps? Pressing? How will he adapt from NBA? Recruiting plan? Staff? He can't bring a staff with him. That's the info I look for, not just random opinions based off random opinions of others.
When have Jamie Dixon and Jay Wright ever failed to recruit a competent high school point guard for 6 years? And Wright's Final Four is a trump card in his favor as well.
How about his recruiting pitch every time he goes into a prospect's home. "Yes, I can get you there. I was a head coach in the league for 7 years and I just recently spent some time with a few alright basketball players. Rondo, Garnett, Allen, and Pierce.. Maybe you've heard of them?"
So can he develop that player as an 18 yr old, or is he better suited to teach them on the NBA level? Just saying they are totally different game. Not against the guy and don't really know who I favor, just looking at some more solid info to base my opinion, rather than grabbing the latest hot name and jumping on board.