Why are we paying a basketball coach elite money if we don't expect elite results? Jerry Green made the NCAA Tournament every year, which proves it doesn't take a particularly skilled coach to make the field at UT, being paid middle of the road SEC money. If just hanging around the field and leaving winning the games that actually matter to someone else is the standard, I'd just as soon find another Jerry Green, pay him accordingly and use the extra money to rehire Rodney Garner.
Posted via VolNation Mobile
I love the Pearlophobes comparisons to Green, it's almost comical. Ok,on the front end, tell me how much talent O'Neill left Green as compared to Peterson to Pearl? I remember three McD's AAs that fell into his lap, along with an unreal amount of talent to complement them. Pearl had Lofton and Major Wingate (Plus, I know how much you love Dane Bradshaw, who was a very good role player, IMO, but not AA material.)
On the tail end, tell me what the talent was brought in by the two, in comparison. Andy Ikeakor vs. Kenny Hall? Brandon Crump vs. Jordan McRae? Uncle Jed making all of 4 recruiting trips his last year is far worse than your BS rankling of Pearl for his time in the Maccabi Games. I also don't remember Pearl losing by 30 to a directional school from Missouri and his players hating his guts.
Yeah, they're not the same. Nice try, though.
But, anyway, as far as salaries go, I believe Pearl is third in the SEC. Not exactly "elite" and, considering he has the best record in the SEC over that time, a pretty good investment.
Also, as far as "competing with South Carolina and Vandy or UConn", well let's take a look at Pearl's 4 years as a comparison:
UConn-7 NCAA wins (out of 3 qualified)
Tennessee- 5 NCAA wins (out of all 4 qualified)
Vandy- 2 NCAA wins (out of 2 qualified)
USC- 0 NCAA wins (0 qualified)
So, which ones are we closer to?