OK, my experience has been mainly with emergency care....but then you conveniently ignored the obvious implication of that fact that I've only ever really used it for emergency care.....I have always had private coverage!! Yep, despite what everyone on the right may tell you..we have two systems running side by side. Private for those that can afford it or whose employer provides it...and public for those that cannot afford it or whose emplyer does not provide it. The only difference is that employer provided private healthcare isnt a standard part of an employment package like it is here. You need to have a fairly decent job. i.e. none of my friends have private healthcare as they all have fairly average jobs, but any professional person is likely to have private healthcare.
But no, your right. Depsite spending 25 years of my life in the UK, with almost everyone I know using the NHS, you know best. What do you want, shall I list every example of non-essential care that I've ever experienced just to prove to you that I'm not just making it up?
OK, I know statistics can say an awful lot but can also mask a lot of truths...however, are you saying that we dont have alcoholics, fat people, drug addicts etc in Europe? We have more than our fair share of unhealthy lifestyles here. This is an argument I've heard a lot and I'm yet to hear an answer. I dont get what is so different about the US that they cannot have a decent public health system, yet virtually every other western country can. In the UK I paid roughly the same amount of tax as I do here now in the US (actually, due to NY City tax I pay slightly more tax here), yet I'm missing a massive public service...where does that money go?
As for the last part, we have plenty or world renowned hospitals and medical facilities in London. Kings College near where I'm from runs the largest liver transplant facility in Europe and covers more liver problems than any hospital in the world. Great Ormond Street was the first hospital in the world primarily dedicated to the field of childrens medicine and continues to be a pioneer in that field. So in fact plenty of people in Europe come to London for cutting edge medicine. Now, I'm not saying that you dont have these things in the US because clearly you do, but the idea that the US is the only country that has specialist and cutting edge medicine is absurd. Is your statement based on any actual fact, or simply your assumption that nowhere else on earth could possibly be as advanced as the US? Also, I know this may be hard to grasp..but putting 'period' at the end of a statement doesnt win the debate or connote any kind of authority...you are aware of that right?
In fact, do me a favour. Give me your first hand experience of UK or European healthcare systems and how they have compared to your experience in the US.