SapplyValues

Like I said, if we enforced the laws that could theoretically be OK. But we don't enforce them NOW. So how much is a life worth when they ultimately DO kill someone. As it stands now it ain't anywhere near worth the life they stole.

From legalclarity.org:
'For example, a conviction for vehicular homicide while intoxicated might be classified as a second-degree felony, leading to a minimum of three and up to 10 years in prison, along with substantial fines.'

Wow. Kill my wife or my kids and you might get to spend 3 whole years in prison. That's a fair tradeoff, doncha think?

What's a BS drunk driving arrest? Were they drunk or not? It IS the ****ing law you know. What's a 'sober' DUI? Are you referring to a problem with the testing system? That is a COMPLETELY different argument. We have this really wonderful company called Uber or Lyft which invalidates ANY excuse for driving drunk. And again, if the penalty for drunk crashing were severe, it wouldn't get implemented. We don't want to incarcerate people for that.
Just wait until they got out...just sayin'
 
You should step out of South Carolina. People mostly only do that where it's illegal and that's at most about half of states now. Why try to meet up with a dealer when you can simply walk into a dispensary and get what you want?
Yea that statement is completely detached from reality…
 
Of course I have no data to back it up but I doubt that we'd see a noticeable rise in drug addicts if they were legalized. I doubt most people that don't use drugs refrain because they are illegal.

Legalize, regulate like alcohol and allow employers to set their own drug use and testing policy.
No I agree. Anyone that wants hard drugs is going to get it regardless, the law isn’t what’s stopping anyone. Regulating it just feels like it’s enabling addiction and making it more accessible. But it’s also not the governments job to regulate addictions idk
 
You should step out of South Carolina. People mostly only do that where it's illegal and that's at most about half of states now. Why try to meet up with a dealer when you can simply walk into a dispensary and get what you want?
I’ve been all over this country. And I know what I’m talking about. I’m not talking about people who get gummies or weed vapes
 
I’ve been all over this country. And I know what I’m talking about. I’m not talking about people who get gummies or weed vapes
Nope. People still buy good ole fashioned marijuana buds from the dispensary. And I don’t know why you would attempt to draw a distinction between leaf and a vape - it’s still THC.
 
I challenge anyone who has gone through the process of meeting up with/waiting for a dealer to say they prefer that system. NYC had "delivery services" that made it easier and I still don't miss that at all

it's a trade off - in California in particular. illegal can be cheaper, more discreet, etc.



On the one hand, weed is now as normal to many consumers as a glass of wine or a bottle of beer. A growing number of companies offer government tested, well-regulated products. But a huge amount of the cannabis being sold in the U.S. still comes from bootleg operations. California officials acknowledge illegal sales still far outpace transactions through licensed shops and vendors.
 
I disagree. Liberals don't believe in enforcing laws.
You're free to disagree. Trying to parse every comment as something in the ideological spectrum is not only stupid, but extremely ignorant. FTR, I believe in enforcing laws. I just stated a fact about how many people acquire MJ and yes, that method is illegal. LE apparently isn't paying attention because you never hear of anyone getting busted for selling a qtr bag from the quantity they acquired at a dispensary.

You're a poster boy
 

Advertisement



Back
Top