President Donald Trump - J.D. Vance Administration

I remember 6$ diesel under Biden.
I also remember 60$ OSB.

Trump is *****ing the bed but let’s not act like it’s any worse than Biden *****ing his pants.
Trump wears diapers and sh!ts them just like Biden..

1777986386868.jpeg

I'm talking gasoline, not diesel. Lots of people here feel bad about Cali residents paying high gas prices apparently.
 
Trump wears diapers and sh!ts them just like Biden..

View attachment 830355

I'm talking gasoline, not diesel. Lots of people here feel bad about Cali residents paying high gas prices apparently.
Nothing Trump has done made anything about Biden ok.
Gas was 4$ and diesel was 6$ here.

Trying to make the previous guy seem better because the current guy is terrible is moronic.
 
He violates the Emoluments Clause every few days and people here still act like he's losing money being President lol
The Hunter paintings scheme was laughably transparent, and the Biden family was dipping.

But their schemes pale in comparison to the Trump rackets. The Trumps don’t even try to obscure it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Smokey123
Lol. Imagine bragging about a problem you caused not being as bad as made up "experts" supposedly said it would be. What a moron. I have to imagine if you still support Trump youre either dirt poor, have a high school at best education, or both.


Everybody was wrong,” Trump said. “They thought that energy would be at $300, right? Three hundred dollars a barrel. And it’s, like, at $100. And I think going down. And I see it going down very substantially when this is over.”

“I see it going down very substantially when this is over,” Trump said. “I think very rapidly too at levels that you’ve never seen. Because there’s there’s a lot of energy out there. Ships all over the world that are loaded up with it. They can’t do much with it because they got kidnapped by a pretty evil place, but we’re taking care of it.”




 
The Hunter paintings scheme was laughably transparent, and the Biden family was dipping.

But their schemes pale in comparison to the Trump rackets. The Trumps don’t even try to obscure it.

So what person/organization/corporation received preferential government treatment or benefitted financially from the "hunter painting scheme"?
 
Lol. Imagine bragging about a problem you caused not being as bad as made up "experts" supposedly said it would be. What a moron. I have to imagine if you still support Trump youre either dirt poor, have a high school at best education, or both.


Everybody was wrong,” Trump said. “They thought that energy would be at $300, right? Three hundred dollars a barrel. And it’s, like, at $100. And I think going down. And I see it going down very substantially when this is over.”

“I see it going down very substantially when this is over,” Trump said. “I think very rapidly too at levels that you’ve never seen. Because there’s there’s a lot of energy out there. Ships all over the world that are loaded up with it. They can’t do much with it because they got kidnapped by a pretty evil place, but we’re taking care of it.”




lol coming from someone who voted for Trump 3 times. Watching you cry for the next 3 years like a toddler is going to be so much fun. You got 991 days of whine posting left
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman
So what person/organization/corporation received preferential government treatment or benefitted financially from the "hunter painting scheme"?
Only the most devout of the Big Blue faithful would still argue that was completely innocuous.

Carry on the fight good foot soldier. The Party thanks you.
 
There’s an entire thread on it. Go read it. I’m certainly not going to go fetch it for you.

Or, just keep parroting the party line.

Lol give me the Cliffsnotes version, who benefitted from the "Hunter Biden Painting" scheme?

Should be easy for you since it's "so obvious".
 
Lol give me the Cliffsnotes version, who benefitted from the "Hunter Biden Painting" scheme?

Should be easy for you since it's "so obvious".
Lol are you quoting yourself? Why is so obvious in quotes… you’re the only one that’s used it.

Here, knock yourself out -
 
Good. But if we actually GAS about vehicle emissions there would be a push to convert automobiles to NG instead of electric.
They would rather let China and Russia rape the environment through strip mining to produce energy that doesn't work in the cold or wet. Have us drive vehicles that are heavier that destroy our roads and release more micro plastics during tire wear. Tire wear higher than lighter vehicles that put a strain on the rubber tree population which in turn has caused mas deforestation to grow more rubber tree farms. So, get out of here with your silly pragmatism.
 
They would rather let China and Russia rape the environment through strip mining to produce energy that doesn't work in the cold or wet. Have us drive vehicles that are heavier that destroy our roads and release more micro plastics during tire wear. Tire wear higher than lighter vehicles that put a strain on the rubber tree population which in turn has caused mas deforestation to grow more rubber tree farms. So, get out of here with your silly pragmatism.
They don't work in wet or cold? While the tires may be true I believe they produce less net pollution than an ice vehicle. But sure, blame the small number of ev for deforestation
 
Lol are you quoting yourself? Why is so obvious in quotes… you’re the only one that’s used it.

Here, knock yourself out -

I'll take from your lack of response, that Volnation scholarship in that thread was also unable to produce a beneficiary of Hunter's nefarious artwork sales.
 
They don't work in wet or cold? While the tires may be true I believe they produce less net pollution than an ice vehicle. But sure, blame the small number of ev for deforestation
Ev”s experience between 20 and 30 percent loss of range in both cold and wet climates. They require more rubber because of the weight.

I think ev”s are cool but they are not the clean energy some seem to believe it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
I'll take from your lack of response, that Volnation scholarship in that thread was also unable to produce a beneficiary of Hunter's nefarious artwork sales.
No, there are multiple names in that thread. Again, if you’re interested - read the thread.

A simpler exercise, since you’re so interested, might include looking at the tally of art sold during Joe’s term and the tally of art sold after Joe was no longer in office.
 
  • Like
Reactions: UT_Dutchman

Advertisement



Back
Top