Too much ice

#13,453
#13,453
Rickyvol77 said:
She had a deportation order from a judge for 26 years
Click to expand...
CBS says you’re wrong. Shocker.


In 2000, she was granted an immigration status known as "withholding of removal," which differsfrom asylum.

Unlike asylum, withholding of removalrecipients cannot apply for permanent U.S. residency. It also does not protect them from being deported to a third-party country.

Batra's attorney told CBS News that his client's status allows her to remain and work legally as long as she doesn't leave the U.S. or commit a crime.

www.cbsnews.com

Longtime courtroom interpreter detained by ICE says she worked in U.S. legally for decades: "You can't sleep because you're afraid"

Meenu Batra, a single mother, was detained at a Texas airport in mid-March. She has worked as a courtroom interpreter in the U.S. for more than 20 years.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol and NashVol11
#13,454
#13,454
RockyTop85 said:
CBS says you’re wrong. Shocker.


In 2000, she was granted an immigration status known as "withholding of removal," which differsfrom asylum.

Unlike asylum, withholding of removalrecipients cannot apply for permanent U.S. residency. It also does not protect them from being deported to a third-party country.

Batra's attorney told CBS News that his client's status allows her to remain and work legally as long as she doesn't leave the U.S. or commit a crime.

www.cbsnews.com

Longtime courtroom interpreter detained by ICE says she worked in U.S. legally for decades: "You can't sleep because you're afraid"

Meenu Batra, a single mother, was detained at a Texas airport in mid-March. She has worked as a courtroom interpreter in the U.S. for more than 20 years.
www.cbsnews.com www.cbsnews.com
Click to expand...
in response to an Observer request for comment, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson noted that Batra had “a final order of removal from an immigration judge in 2000” and said “She will remain in ICE custody pending removal and will receive full due process.”

The spokesperson continued: “Employment authorization does NOT confer any type of legal status in the United States,” adding that the department is encouraging all “illegal aliens” to “self-deport.”
 
#13,455
#13,455
Rickyvol77 said:
in response to an Observer request for comment, a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson noted that Batra had “a final order of removal from an immigration judge in 2000” and said “She will remain in ICE custody pending removal and will receive full due process.”

The spokesperson continued: “Employment authorization does NOT confer any type of legal status in the United States,” adding that the department is encouraging all “illegal aliens” to “self-deport.”
Click to expand...
In 2000, she was granted an immigration status known as "withholding of removal," which differsfrom asylum.
 
#13,457
#13,457
Rickyvol77 said:
According to her lawyer's claim....DHS says she had a final order of removal. She will be deported to another country
Click to expand...
DHS also continuously renewed her EAD (which wouldn’t have been legal if she were subject to a deportation order). So either either they’re making a mistake now or they made one every few years for 26 years.

Best case scenario is that it’s a contested issue that you’ve presented as fact. So, as I said, you’re wrong.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#13,458
#13,458
RockyTop85 said:
DHS also continuously renewed her EAD (which wouldn’t have been legal if she were subject to a deportation order). So either either they’re making a mistake now or they made one every few years for 26 years.

Best case scenario is that it’s a contested issue that you’ve presented as fact. So, as I said, you’re wrong.
Click to expand...
Guess we will see how long she stays in the country
 
#13,462
#13,462
Rickyvol77 said:
I trust DHS’ facts more than a slimy NGO lawyer. Thus will be proven right in a court of law
Click to expand...
DHS facts like the ones they fabricated to illegally detain and deport Abrego-Garcia?

Or the DHS facts that re-upped her EAD umpteen times since the “deportation order?”

You know they would have to provide a copy of the asylum disposition order to get her EAD approved, right?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#13,463
#13,463
RockyTop85 said:
DHS facts like the ones they fabricated to illegally detain and deport Abrego-Garcia?

Or the DHS facts that re-upped her EAD umpteen times since the “deportation order?”

You know they would have to provide a copy of the asylum disposition order to get her EAD approved, right?
Click to expand...
"illegally detain and deport Abrego-Garcia"
😂
 
  • Like
Reactions: LibertyVol
#13,465
#13,465
RockyTop85 said:
uh, oh. Suddenly seems like RickyBootLicky doesn’t care about the court of law decision unless it affirms his priors.
Click to expand...
Bootlicky? That doesn't even make sense in the context of this conversation.

There are judges who make wrong court decisions all the time that get overturned because they used to be political hacks/ambulance chaser type lawyers who don't actually go by the laws in place.

No surprising that you relate.

But be sure to tell how Abrego-Garcia is illegally detained and deported when he's sitting in a Third World country soon, trying to continue his criminal enterprises
 
#13,466
#13,466
Rickyvol77 said:
Bootlicky? That doesn't even make sense in the context of this conversation.

There are judges who make wrong court decisions all the time that get overturned because they used to be political hacks/ambulance chaser type lawyers who don't actually go by the laws in place.

No surprising that you relate.

But be sure to tell how Abrego-Garcia is illegally detained and deported when he's sitting in a Third World country soon, trying to continue his criminal enterprises
Click to expand...
“There are judges who make wrong court decisions all the time…but we definitely can trust the judges when they rule the way I want.”

That’s some “guy who can’t understand that ‘I trust DHS facts even when they don’t make logical sense’ is bootlicking” logic.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
#13,467
#13,467
RockyTop85 said:
“There are judges who make wrong court decisions all the time…but we definitely can trust the judges when they rule the way I want.”

That’s some “guy who can’t understand that ‘I trust DHS facts even when they don’t make logical sense’ is bootlicking” logic.
Click to expand...
"the way I want"

hilarious, following the actual laws in place isn't some team game....for most normal people who actually know the laws

DHS has been proven right in the end, and again Mr. "domestic violence illegal who just happened to end up in a car owned by a human trafficker carrying more illegals" will live and die in a Third World country.

Saying that following the laws equals bootlicking is what ambulance chasers say or someone who makes excuses to why they try to get violent criminals out of jail
 
#13,468
#13,468
Rickyvol77 said:
"the way I want"

hilarious, following the actual laws in place isn't some team game....for most normal people who actually know the laws

DHS has been proven right in the end, and again Mr. "domestic violence illegal who just happened to end up in a car owned by a human trafficker carrying more illegals" will live and die in a Third World country.

Saying that following the laws equals bootlicking is what ambulance chasers say or someone who makes excuses to why they try to get violent criminals out of jail
Click to expand...
Bless your heart.

People who only care if the law is followed don’t make pitiful excuses when multiple courts whack federal agencies on the nose for not following the law.

The only reason I brought up Abrego Garcia is because I knew you’d step on that rake. How did I know? Because you’re the kind of guy who spends all his money on onlyfans pages devoted to just pictures of boots.

You don’t know enough about immigration law to know when the law is being followed.

This isn’t even a question of law. It’s a question of fact. You absolutely decided that she had a 26 year old deportation order based on your desire to deepthroat the footwear of the person who said it and absolutely nothing else.

If those things weren’t both true, you’d have changed your mind or at least been able to make another superficial, self-righteous, boot slathering post, like this one 👆, that at least makes a show of addressing why you trust unnamed DHS spokesperson over the other DHS employees who had to review her EAD every 18 months for 26 years to make sure she had proof that her immigration status allowed her to work. They might wear boots too!

Honestly the only unpredictable thing about this exchange is that the boot licking thing bothered you so much. I just assumed you owned it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol and NashVol11
#13,469
#13,469
RockyTop85 said:
If those things weren’t both true, you’d have changed your mind or at least been able to make another superficial, self-righteous, boot slathering post, like this one 👆, that at least makes a show of addressing why you trust unnamed DHS spokesperson over the other DHS employees who had to review her EAD every 18 months for 26 years to make sure she had proof that her immigration status allowed her to work. They might wear boots too!
Click to expand...
This paragraph merits elaboration.

The woman worked for 20 years as an interpreter (likely requires some kind of approval from a state agency) and she had an employment authorization document that was approved by a department within DHS.
The sultry boot wearing DHS spokesman said that the EAD doesn’t confer any specific immigration status.
That’s true. But it does require certain immigration status (See here).
1776738277343.png

She had to produce a copy of the final order 20 years ago and every 18 months thereafter to get and renew the employment authorization document.

At this point, is anybody but Ricky unable to figure out why every single story about this lady reports the outcome of her asylum proceedings as fact and the 26 year old deportation order was reported with attribution to a statement of the DHS spokesperson?

Here’s a hint: if you had to submit a specific document to the government every 18 months, would you keep a copy of it or go back to DHS and get a new one every 18 months?
 
#13,471
#13,471
Get rid of Trump, his cabinet, and family. Not only impeach, also capture back all the pardoned criminals.
 
#13,472
#13,472
WoodsmanVol said:
Government sponsored terrorists is what they are.
apnews.com

Federal appeals court blocks California law requiring federal agents to wear identification

An appeals court has blocked a California law passed in 2025 requiring federal immigration agents to wear a badge or some form of identification.
apnews.com apnews.com
Click to expand...
California went about it wrong. Can't tell the feds what to do. Didn't work for Texas, shouldn't work for California either.

What California should do is rewrite their standards where they won't cooperate with any individual who they can not visually identify, for the safety of the officers involved due to the numerous cases of ICE copycats.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVol77 and Orangeslice13
#13,475
#13,475
rekinhavoc said:
Click to expand...


Trying to make sense of the point here. 250 of 270 arrested people had criminal records? Why are they wording it so weird? The hope is that it would be 100%, right? Wtf should we bother non-criminal DACA kids?

It's almost like they're trying to trick you into thinking 93% of DACA recipients are criminals.

They do **** like that because they don't want to tell you the big picture stats.

1000046833.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol and NashVol11
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top