Bigorangefan 98
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2024
- Messages
- 1,450
- Likes
- 1,924
Largely agree with this. We’ll have traded front court depth for backcourt depth, which many on here have been clamoring for, for years. Seems that we’ll add another big, regardless of what Juke/Ament do, but it would still be the inverse of what we had last year, with about the same expectations imo.The current roster minus a possible Juke add is probably equivalent talent wise to this past team and the models reflect that.
It’s probably pretty good, but certainly not elite. It is what is is. Just trying to be grateful for their efforts![]()
Who ? The Vols ? They got their PG1, Hill. Vols are fine as long as they get Juke. Now, if he goes to Michigan, then you can say they wasted time, energy and words. But, Tanner was nothing but a message board rumor
Better offensively forsure, that’s hard to argue.
But what are you giving up defensively? Basically zero roster retention, so what’s chemistry like?
I agree with the overall premise, however I’d argue the depth is good but devoid of stars.I will hold off on final judgement of the roster till it’s complete so as not to be accused of “freaking out.” I do think we’re a few pieces away still from being better than this year though. The last three spots will be huge, because if the goal is Final Four I want 8-9 strong rotation spots. Our depth is exclusively freshmen right now and Troy Henderson.
Didn't they just recently layoff like 20% of the companies workforce? I'm also a contractor and know first hand they are terrible to work for on that end also.
Agreed. Right now I think we have a top 17-22 type of roster. I don’t think many here would be happy with that especially considering the money we are spending and Barnes adapting his entire philosophy this offseason.I agree with the overall premise, however I’d argue the depth is good but devoid of stars.
Ament & Ja’Kobi > Hill & Haralson
Really need a Tanner, Juke, Anderson, maybe Ament back to take this team over the hump, imo.
Agreed, coming out of this without Juke or Ament back would be super deflating if you have your sights set on a Final Four.Agreed. Right now I think we have a top 17-22 type of roster. I don’t think many here would be happy with that especially considering the money we are spending and Barnes adapting his entire philosophy this offseason.
If we were to add Juke and another solid big or even 2, I could easily see us having a guaranteed top 10 team next season
I agree with the overall premise, however I’d argue the depth is good but devoid of stars.
Ament & Ja’Kobi > Hill & Haralson
Really need a Tanner, Juke, Anderson, maybe Ament back to take this team over the hump, imo.
I think you're deluluI guess right now sans Juke, I would take this year’s “best 5” over the portal class we have.
Gillespie over Hill
Ames over Boswell
Ament over Lundblade
Estrella = Haralson
Okpara over Rubin
I think where the potential for the 2026-2027 team comes in is if we can stack enough depth. This past year we had shockingly little quality depth after pre-season discussions have the team being generally thought of one of our deeper rosters. We found out that was wrong.
We lack star power with this portal class but if we can bring in 3 contributors with these last spots then overall the team could be better. Remains to be seen.
I guess right now sans Juke, I would take this year’s “best 5” over the portal class we have.
Gillespie over Hill
Ames over Boswell
Ament over Lundblade
Estrella = Haralson
Okpara over Rubin
I think where the potential for the 2026-2027 team comes in is if we can stack enough depth. This past year we had shockingly little quality depth after pre-season discussions have the team being generally thought of one of our deeper rosters. We found out that was wrong.
We lack star power with this portal class but if we can bring in 3 contributors with these last spots then overall the team could be better. Remains to be seen.
