Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

#8,752
#8,752
Looks like the reason that Epstein was trying to get dirt to help bring down Trump was because Trump was the one who called the police on him in 2006, securing his first investigation and likely conviction.

Weird again that Trump would do that if he were implicated in child rape with him
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#8,753
#8,753
Rickyvol77 said:
Looks like the reason that Epstein was trying to get dirt to help bring down Trump was because Trump was the one who called the police on him in 2006, securing his first investigation and likely conviction.

Weird again that Trump would do that if he were implicated in child rape with him
Click to expand...

They knew they truly had nothing on him. But they enjoyed the disingenuous game. Huff is still playing that game and using the inability to prove a negative as a badge of honor.

“This doesn’t prove he was innocent”, it’s an insane and irrational argument
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#8,756
#8,756
Rickyvol77 said:
Looks like the reason that Epstein was trying to get dirt to help bring down Trump was because Trump was the one who called the police on him in 2006, securing his first investigation and likely conviction.

Weird again that Trump would do that if he were implicated in child rape with him
Click to expand...

Well, why be a pedo protector? All of the documents haven't been released, nothing from the CIA or NSA. And I seriously doubt even the DOJ/FBI has release even a fraction.

The Pedophile Protector in Chief.
 
#8,757
#8,757
LouderVol said:
i don't get why they are blurring the names of possible accomplices. victims make sense, but some of these emails get to the point where they need to really be looked into.
Click to expand...

Because they are being protected, just like the 10 co-conspirators listed in one FBI report, and the 25 spoken about I guess with Maxwell documents.
 
#8,758
#8,758
VAVol85 said:
What’s needed is for someone to say “this man did that with underage girls” so that DoJ is obliged to investigate specific people not some vague conspiracy. Victims won’t do it because they are scared or have NDAs. If here was a conspiracy, then Maxwell could provide a loose thread to unravel it.
Click to expand...

What vague conspiracy? The government has already admitted to like 100-200 victims, you think one guy did that? It was a whole operation if you look even the redacted files.

If here was a conspiracy, then Maxwell could provide a loose thread to unravel it.
Click to expand...
Click to expand...

The U.S. government already knows which is why they have already disclosed 10 co-conspirators in the release and in the Maxwell 25 co-conspirators.

I'm not sure what you guys are even talking about, there isn't anything to unravel - the government is refusing to prosecute and is protecting the pedophiles. You could bring the government all kinds of information and they will tell you thanks, now get the **** out.
 
#8,759
#8,759
LSU-SIU said:
What vague conspiracy? The government has already admitted to like 100-200 victims, you think one guy did that? It was a whole operation if you look even the redacted files.



The U.S. government already knows which is why they have already disclosed 10 co-conspirators in the release and in the Maxwell 25 co-conspirators.

I'm not sure what you guys are even talking about, there isn't anything to unravel - the government is refusing to prosecute and is protecting the pedophiles. You could bring the government all kinds of information and they will tell you thanks, now get the **** out.
Click to expand...
Maybe read instead of rant. In the very post you are replying to I said, ‘What’s needed is for someone to say “this man did that with underage girls” so that DoJ is obliged to investigate’.

Public pressure forced release of the files and public pressure combined with specific allegations against specific people can force prosecution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
#8,760
#8,760
VAVol85 said:
Maybe read instead of rant. In the very post you are replying to I said, ‘What’s needed is for someone to say “this man did that with underage girls” so that DoJ is obliged to investigate’.

Public pressure forced release of the files and public pressure combined with specific allegations against specific people can force prosecution.
Click to expand...

I'm not ranting, I am telling the blunt truth. They're not going to do anything. What is this weak ass "investigation" going to do? They simply should be "prosecuting" not "investigating".

They have already identified countless co-conspirators, what comes next "prosecution". They're not going to prosecute, and they will continue to hide any and all co-conspirators.
 
#8,761
#8,761
volfanhill said:
There isn't a world or timeframe that exists where you wouldn't call a foul if he granted her any sort of reduction in punishment . You see that right?
Click to expand...



There isn't a world or timeframe in which, if he granted her a reduction in punishment, it isn't a clear quid pro quo.
 
#8,762
#8,762
lawgator1 said:
There isn't a world or timeframe in which, if he granted her a reduction in punishment, it isn't a clear quid pro quo.
Click to expand...
So if he extends her a pardon and one of the conditions, is she can't take questions about his involvement due to concerns of a quid pro quo, that would go over jus fine?

He's in a no win situation. Looks guilty no matter what. Now, it's his own damn fault so I don't have any sympathy for him.
 
#8,767
#8,767
hjeagle1vol said:
Rudy knows…we gotta make him whole for all the DNC criminal enterprise did to destroy him.
Click to expand...


This appears to be a distraction, meaning at best Donald Trump (and his predecessors) are pedophile protectors, at worst they were actively involved.

If you notice nobody is going to jail, not really, same team, same results.
(probably time for some more bombings, more protests, maybe kidnap some more people)

giphy.gif
 
#8,769
#8,769
volfanhill said:
So if he extends her a pardon and one of the conditions, is she can't take questions about his involvement due to concerns of a quid pro quo, that would go over jus fine?

He's in a no win situation. Looks guilty no matter what. Now, it's his own damn fault so I don't have any sympathy for him.
Click to expand...


His best course would be to take no action and not respond. Let the process otherwise do its job. If the press asks him, he should simply say that he does not intend to respond.

Now, he won't do that. He'll get defensive and call it a hoax, and misrepresent some things. But his best course is hands off.
 
#8,775
#8,775
volfanhill said:
So if he extends her a pardon and one of the conditions, is she can't take questions about his involvement due to concerns of a quid pro quo, that would go over jus fine?

He's in a no win situation. Looks guilty no matter what. Now, it's his own damn fault so I don't have any sympathy for him.
Click to expand...
He shouldn't be extending her a pardon or anything else under any circumstances.
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top