Too much ice

Here's the thing and it's an honest question. I have no doubt there are plenty of nutcases on the right but does it not seem the left is way more prone to have more people straight up broadcast this kind of crazy?
i would say there is less of a stigma on the left about hiding your nutcases.
 
i would say there is less of a stigma on the left about hiding your nutcases.
If you move far enough left not only is there less stigma but going full 'tard is virtue signalling worthy of praise. That's not a good path.

Crazy people are gullible and impressionable. (that's not a right or left political observation) When crazy attitudes becomes virtuous you're right on the edge of justified crazy action. That can get really ugly pretty fast.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BreatheUT
If you move far enough left not only is there less stigma but going full 'tard is virtue signalling worthy of praise. That's not a good path.

Crazy people are gullible and impressionable. (that's not a right or left political observation) When crazy attitudes becomes virtuous you're right on the edge of justified crazy action. That can get really ugly pretty fast.
I think by default, either extreme accepts and "profits" from their crazies.

taking "right" back from MAGA you get several versions of crazies where being crazy is something they celebrate on the right as well. Think of the sovereign citizen or Westboro Baptist types. Snake handling, and plenty of religious options out there too.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orange_Crush
I have never seen or heard of the Ace of Spades being a racist card. The British used it in WW1, the 101st Airborne in both WW2 and Vietnam. It was used as a Phyops thing as the card of death by various military units. I am so disgusted by the lack of honesty in the media. The internet has become the ultimate tool for propagandist spreading their filth and lies. Accountability for your actions and words has disappeared and it is a sad thing. Was use of the card by ICE outside the boundaries-Absolutely.
So fighting fascists is racist now? Wow... color me shocked.
 
I think by default, either extreme accepts and "profits" from their crazies.

taking "right" back from MAGA you get several versions of crazies where being crazy is something they celebrate on the right as well. Think of the sovereign citizen or Westboro Baptist types. Snake handling, and plenty of religious options out there too.
There's no doubt there are crazies on both sides. I'm going to push back a bit on some of your examples though. Westboro/snake handlers etc are a tiny little fraction of the crazy far right and are memory holed as much as possible by even those that would be considered "far" right. I'm not under the impression you have to go very far to the left before you hit people that are willing to justify and carry out violent action like the person cited in the tweet I originally quoted. It's worse when politicians start playing games with justification like the recent Nadler example also provided.

As an aside are there already Che Guevara shirts with Luigi Mangione's face on them?
 
There's no doubt there are crazies on both sides. I'm going to push back a bit on some of your examples though. Westboro/snake handlers etc are a tiny little fraction of the crazy far right and are memory holed as much as possible by even those that would be considered "far" right. I'm not under the impression you have to go very far to the left before you hit people that are willing to justify and carry out violent action like the person cited in the tweet I originally quoted. It's worse when politicians start playing games with justification like the recent Nadler example also provided.

As an aside are there already Che Guevara shirts with Luigi Mangione's face on them?
The media's job is to convince you that a very small % of crazies are a majority. I'd say that most Dems would not support the craziness on the fringe left that it trying to be normalizes.

I do believe most Democrat politicians refuse to call it out because they are afraid of the fringe left in their party. But I would bet money that the average liberal voter neither shares, nor affirms the craziness being portrayed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Rickyvol77
The media's job is to convince you that a very small % of crazies are a majority. I'd say that most Dems would not support the craziness on the fringe left that it trying to be normalizes.

I do believe most Democrat politicians refuse to call it out because they are afraid of the fringe left in their party. But I would bet money that the average liberal voter neither shares, nor affirms the craziness being portrayed.
Taken as a whole I think you are correct.

Now take a moment to ponder the boldened...really let it marinate. What is that actually saying and what dynamic would it indicate?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NorthDallas40
I don't think I've ever been on here promoting democrat politicians.
Not sure why you would make that inference.

Again, you referenced things like "average liberal voters" but it was what I focused on that was the important part IMO. If, as you suggest, Democrat politicians refuse to call out their crazies due to fear from their "fringe left" wouldn't that imply an awfully strong influence by that "fringe"?
 
Not sure why you would make that inference.

Again, you referenced things like "average liberal voters" but it was what I focused on that was the important part IMO. If, as you suggest, Democrat politicians refuse to call out their crazies due to fear from their "fringe left" wouldn't that imply an awfully strong influence by that "fringe"?
I never claimed there wasn't one. I stated just the opposite.

I merely question any assumption that the average liberal (the majority of liberals) shares, endorses, or excuses the craziness that is being shown and normalized by a few.
 
I never claimed there wasn't one. I stated just the opposite.

I merely question any assumption that the average liberal (the majority of liberals) shares, endorses, or excuses the craziness that is being shown and normalized by a few.
I'm not aware of ever even alluding to any type of "majority" anything. My opening question involved this:

"I have no doubt there are plenty of nutcases on the right but does it not seem the left is way more prone to have more people straight up broadcast this kind of crazy?"

Nothing remotely majority oriented. Do you agree with my impression that more people that identify as on the left are likely to overtly and publicly support/justify violence? (personal and property)
 
... Do you agree with my impression that more people that identify as on the left are likely to overtly and publicly support/justify violence? (personal and property)
I really don't know. I'm not sure how you could either. If we both agree that there is probably an effort to normalize the beliefs and activities of a few, it may just be that a very group is being magnified.

Not having looked deeply into the polls, I have been concerned by polls that indicate a growing acceptance of political violence among younger liberals. I could see it as a strong possibility, but I don't think either of us could safely say that there are more on the left than on the right, overall.

I just don't know.
 

Advertisement



Back
Top