It's not recency bias to say Sampson was the best I've ever seen (born 95). My argument is honestly he is the best Vol RB ever.
Eventually you have to face the fact that the sport has evolved to a science and that some of the legends are legends forever ABSOLUTELY. I could definitely understand that older generational players were arguably TOUGHER due to less safety, targeting, tackling, all around danger. But the game is much more technical now. Sampson would likely be heisman in the 60s and 70s and 80s and 90s if he retained all his modern techniques and evolved football knowledge. Because he was trained to be a robot of perfection down to the millisecond of reading gaps, running angles, ball handling and tackle evasion, and the compiling knowledge of 100 years of the game, and the internet availability for coaches practice curriculum, modern technology, modern workout regiments, billions of dollars involved in perfecting modern athletes, nutrition, training evolution, coaching evolution, etc, vs a freak show talent display over 190lb linebackers. It's a hot take, maybe super ignorant, but I do want to pick the brains of more wise fans who could change my mind and actually have seen both.