BlinghamptonVol
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 2, 2019
- Messages
- 1,666
- Likes
- 3,387
With college football resembling more of a business these days, how would you allot UT's NIL percentage-wise by position?
QB- 15% - If Joey comes back next year, we probably lose Merk. So assume JA, GMac, and Faizon. Need elite talent stacked here.
RB- 4% - Heup's system makes avg RBs look good. No need to spend big here.
WRs/TEs- 9% - spend decent on WR1, but again, Heup's system makes avg pass catchers look good.
OL- 18% - always need the best you can get here.
Offense- 46% - Heup's system saves us some percentage points here because we don't need 5 stars at every position.
Edge- 15% - Huge need in today's game
CB- 15% - same as above
DL- 10% - these guys keep the LBs clean
LB- 8% - just get some good athletes behind the DL.
S- 6% - Don't get beat deep, but the investment in CBs lowers the need for elite players here.
Defense- 54% - If our D could come close to being as good as our O, we're a playoff lock going forward.
What are your thoughts?
QB- 15% - If Joey comes back next year, we probably lose Merk. So assume JA, GMac, and Faizon. Need elite talent stacked here.
RB- 4% - Heup's system makes avg RBs look good. No need to spend big here.
WRs/TEs- 9% - spend decent on WR1, but again, Heup's system makes avg pass catchers look good.
OL- 18% - always need the best you can get here.
Offense- 46% - Heup's system saves us some percentage points here because we don't need 5 stars at every position.
Edge- 15% - Huge need in today's game
CB- 15% - same as above
DL- 10% - these guys keep the LBs clean
LB- 8% - just get some good athletes behind the DL.
S- 6% - Don't get beat deep, but the investment in CBs lowers the need for elite players here.
Defense- 54% - If our D could come close to being as good as our O, we're a playoff lock going forward.
What are your thoughts?
