TNHopeful505
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 11, 2009
- Messages
- 11,678
- Likes
- 21,443
To me, the problem with bowls is the same problem with the NBA and MLB season. There's too many of them. Sure, they're fun. Sure they're different. But aside from unique matchups and destinations, they don't mean anything and are just a liability for players, hence all of the opt outs and what not. To me, I think the playoffs are too big. And I think there's too many bowls.
If I had it my way?
4 Conferences. 16 teams. Everyone plays everyone for a 15 game schedule.
Conference winners get first round byes in playoffs, seeded by point differentials.
The remaining 8 spots are the 2 and 3 spots from each conference, seeded by point differentials.
So, top 3 makes the playoffs from each conference. Beatdowns and dominance are rewarded. That way "strength of schedule" doesn't really matter. You annihilate everyone as best as you can, and you will be rewarded with an easier path. If your conference is "down," then it'll be reflected in the seeding.
There's no cupcake schedules. There's no scheduling weaker teams. You play your conference. You beatdown whoever is in front of you. And you make it to the playoffs. Screw conference championship games. You get one shot at everyone. Make it count and destroy them.
Then you get the 12 "best" teams, you allow for slip ups and off days.
Oh, and one more thing. The team in last place of each conference is relegated down to a smaller conference, and the conference that has the worst performance in the playoffs gets the first pick of the school to replace the bottom program.
I realize, this would never happen. But tell me that's not cleaner and more exciting. If you wanted to match up the #4's, #5's and #6', or so on in bowl games, then you could. But yeah. That's how I'd do it.
If I had it my way?
4 Conferences. 16 teams. Everyone plays everyone for a 15 game schedule.
Conference winners get first round byes in playoffs, seeded by point differentials.
The remaining 8 spots are the 2 and 3 spots from each conference, seeded by point differentials.
So, top 3 makes the playoffs from each conference. Beatdowns and dominance are rewarded. That way "strength of schedule" doesn't really matter. You annihilate everyone as best as you can, and you will be rewarded with an easier path. If your conference is "down," then it'll be reflected in the seeding.
There's no cupcake schedules. There's no scheduling weaker teams. You play your conference. You beatdown whoever is in front of you. And you make it to the playoffs. Screw conference championship games. You get one shot at everyone. Make it count and destroy them.
Then you get the 12 "best" teams, you allow for slip ups and off days.
Oh, and one more thing. The team in last place of each conference is relegated down to a smaller conference, and the conference that has the worst performance in the playoffs gets the first pick of the school to replace the bottom program.
I realize, this would never happen. But tell me that's not cleaner and more exciting. If you wanted to match up the #4's, #5's and #6', or so on in bowl games, then you could. But yeah. That's how I'd do it.
