Joey Halzle linked to Florida offensive coordinator job

#80
#80
BigOrangeTrain said:
Wait I thought Halze sucks according to many of our genius fans?
Click to expand...

Whoever’s calling the plays in pressure situations sucks.

Georgia - TO - offense has a chance to go up 2 scores- plays for the FG and 8 point lead.

Alabama - Ball at the 1 - timeouts Remaining - proper clock management and you have 2 running plays - screws up clock management - 99 yard pass interception for TD

Oklahoma - TO in plus territory - 3 and out

Vanderbilt - play calling was complete garbage in the second half
 
  • Like
Reactions: mpfvol and Vol737
#81
#81
Heupel better make some changes soon or the fans will stop paying the 'talent fee' ticket prices.

I say fire at least 2 coaches on both sides of the ball. Send a message. Get right or we're all fired next year.
 
#82
#82
McDad said:
Rightfully so. His ability to scheme players open, take advantage of mismatches, and reproduce great offense with 4 different QBs in 5 years might be the most impressive thing in NCAA offenses. We are on pace to have over 500 points scored this season. Second only to Hooker's second year.

Impressive prowess, indeed.
Click to expand...

Yep. Best offensive mind in FBS the past 5 years. What impressed me most was actually last year....when we did NOT have a QB that could read the field and work thru his progressions ..CJH found a way to simplify the passing offense enough to keep a defense off balance. So we could lead the SEC in rushing for the 2nd year in a row and still score points. He had to go way outside his comfort zone to be a run first, field position coach who relied on his running game and defense to win ballgames. He would mucn rather spread defenses out and gash them over the top. He showed for the 1st time that he could evolve his strategy to suit deficiencies in personnel (Nico).

We are very lucky to have CJH and these clowns that talk smack about him are an embarrassment. Theyre usually either clueless about football, extremely emotional tittiebabies, or both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TN1111, dduncan4163, kcvols1 and 1 other person
#83
#83
marcusluvsvols said:
Yep. Best offensive mind in FBS the past 5 years. What impressed me most was actually last year....when we did NOT have a QB that could read the field and work thru his progressions ..CJH found a way to simplify the passing offense enough to keep a defense off balance. So we could lead the SEC in rushing for the 2nd year in a row and still score points. He had to go way outside his comfort zone to be a run first, field position coach who relied on his running game and defense to win ballgames. He would mucn rather spread defenses out and gash them over the top. He showed for the 1st time that he could evolve his strategy to suit deficiencies in personnel (Nico).

We are very lucky to have CJH and these clowns that talk smack about him are an embarrassment. Theyre usually either clueless about football, extremely emotional tittiebabies, or both.
Click to expand...
Ollie Lane said that Golesh was typically thinking 3-5 plays ahead when he was in the box, but with Halzle Josh was way more involved in calling plays and things were more reactive than proactive on a play by play basis.

Marlon Walls said now that Golesh is gone, Josh is too involved in play calling and he needs someone he trusts so he can focus on managing the game.

Do you think these former Vols are clueless or tittbabies? Feel free to let them know.
 
#85
#85
McDad said:
Forgive my ridiculousness. This is your first reply to me:


When you say, "we have yet to see this offense succeed against an elite defense", are those not singular? I don't see the plurality in your statement. Perhaps you intended to mean it has to happen more than once and you failed to communicate it adequately.

But going by your first post, if it is found once then it would make your statement incorrect.

So, how many times does this have to happen for you to see success?
Click to expand...

Not sure why you're being a douche and trying to take every aspect as a binary construct. It's obvious the offense has struggled to score points against good defenses and has struggled against just about everyone in the red zone. Do you really think this offense has done well against some of the better teams? Aside from '22 which has proven to be an outlier so far under Heup, this question is almost rhetorical. I mean what are you actually trying to do with these responses other than whataboutism? So, I'm going to do the work for you...

Even if I include '22 and lower the standards to just the top 50 scoring defenses overall (and include any SEC defenses in the top 75), the offense has scored 24.8 ppg in those matchups. A sample size of 25 games. If we remove '22, that number goes to 21 ppg. So, '22 aside we're basically scoring 21 points per game against any defense with just a pulse - much less elite defenses.
 
#86
#86
Surely to the Great Lord above these coaches can see a defensive line that opens up like the Red Sea, and an offense that only made adjustments to let the opposing team catch up in the second half.

Im not sure if you all noticed, but Halzle was the only human being in the entire stadium with a surprised look on his face with the interception at the goal line at Alabama.

If they want them, by all means. There has to be coaches out there who can make adjustments throughout the game, because ours do not understand the concept. You don't wait around until another team wants your coach. You cut them out and let the devil sort them out.
 
Last edited:
#89
#89
marcusluvsvols said:
Yep. Best offensive mind in FBS the past 5 years. What impressed me most was actually last year....when we did NOT have a QB that could read the field and work thru his progressions ..CJH found a way to simplify the passing offense enough to keep a defense off balance. So we could lead the SEC in rushing for the 2nd year in a row and still score points. He had to go way outside his comfort zone to be a run first, field position coach who relied on his running game and defense to win ballgames. He would mucn rather spread defenses out and gash them over the top. He showed for the 1st time that he could evolve his strategy to suit deficiencies in personnel (Nico).

We are very lucky to have CJH and these clowns that talk smack about him are an embarrassment. Theyre usually either clueless about football, extremely emotional tittiebabies, or both.
Click to expand...
I'm not totally sure Heupel was outside his comfort zone last year. Most great offensive minds know how to be creative and design the run game to be the most effective weapon in an offense that might be thought of more for its passing than running. Even in '22, we ran the ball 55% of the time
 
#90
#90
UT97Vol said:
Not sure why you're being a douche and trying to take every aspect as a binary construct. It's obvious the offense has struggled to score points against good defenses and has struggled against just about everyone in the red zone. Do you really think this offense has done well against some of the better teams? Aside from '22 which has proven to be an outlier so far under Heup, this question is almost rhetorical. I mean what are you actually trying to do with these responses other than whataboutism? So, I'm going to do the work for you...

Even if I include '22 and lower the standards to just the top 50 scoring defenses overall (and include any SEC defenses in the top 75), the offense has scored 24.8 ppg in those matchups. A sample size of 25 games. If we remove '22, that number goes to 21 ppg. So, '22 aside we're basically scoring 21 points per game against any defense with just a pulse - much less elite defenses.
Click to expand...
What is douchey about reading your message as typed.? I was willing to do full dive into the data because in weird way that if fun for me. But why would I want to do that now? YOU, not me, used a singular.

Communicate better, put me on ignore, or just don't respond in the future. I have no tolerance for people who are not self aware.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13 and Behr
#91
#91
marcusluvsvols said:
Yep. Best offensive mind in FBS the past 5 years. What impressed me most was actually last year....when we did NOT have a QB that could read the field and work thru his progressions ..CJH found a way to simplify the passing offense enough to keep a defense off balance. So we could lead the SEC in rushing for the 2nd year in a row and still score points. He had to go way outside his comfort zone to be a run first, field position coach who relied on his running game and defense to win ballgames. He would mucn rather spread defenses out and gash them over the top. He showed for the 1st time that he could evolve his strategy to suit deficiencies in personnel (Nico).

We are very lucky to have CJH and these clowns that talk smack about him are an embarrassment. Theyre usually either clueless about football, extremely emotional tittiebabies, or both.
Click to expand...
Emotional toddlers brother. We have the premier offensive mind in CFB and they want to run him off. Make it make sense
 
#97
#97
CAVPUT said:
Did Henson overlap with Heupel at Missouri? If so, that might be a connection worth pursuing since he seems to prefer guys he's worked with.
Click to expand...
I believe Heupel was the new OC at Missouri in 2016 and replaced him from the year before, so no I don’t believe they overlapped.
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top