Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell

#6,677
#6,677
Curious as to who the whole list would extend to. I'm guessing Schumer, Biden, Harris, (maybe) W. Bush would be some good starting points. Look for CEOs of big corporations also if the list is released. Furthermore, who has the files? The CIA or the DOJ?
 
#6,678
#6,678
LouderVol said:
I have read parts of it, and at best for her, I think she is telling partial truths. I don't doubt that there were actual 18+ whores involved with Epstein and Maxwell at various points. which yes, that would absolve those two of any guilty, on the assumption that that is all that were there.

but that's a real big, and bad, assumption imo. we know some of the victims started out as children. regardless of what Maxwell claims.

imo the whores (I am designating these as any 18+ women who actually chose to be there and participate knowingly and willingly) were cover/plausible deniability. also expands the demographics willing to participate with Epstein. I am willing to bet those two used the mix to their advantage in honey trapping some of the people there. give them a couple legal women to get their guard down, then oops that 4th one was 16, now you cant turn on us without outing yourself as a pedo.

From Virginia's testimony we know they used a similar strategy for recruiting the underage girls. get them involved on something legal, then keep drip feeding their exposure to the illegal stuff where its hard for them to tell the difference, and then they are stuck in a bad situation. and then using some of the victims to recruit new ones
Click to expand...

I get the feeling there is more, but she basically sticks to her guns. She even goes on to talk about one victim that she only meet after she was 20 (comes up about a 18th birthday card). To say there isn't some very bizarre things going on with this from top to bottom would be an understatement. I mean it looks like she was basically out of this in the early 2000s, she even claims no investigator even contacted her about all stuff from 2009.

My basic summary so far is, she lined up adult girls but she was mostly shielded from anything sexual for the most part, but doesn't exactly deny saying she never saw sex with Epstein. (its a little strange in the deposition at a few points) She claims she was basically out by early 2000s but did a few things for him later but not much. She was involved with the Clintons until 2018 at least, and Trump is mentioned in a positive light.

(I'm almost finished with her deposition, I'll try and read her trial transcript later in the week)
 
#6,679
#6,679
Peradox1K said:
Curious as to who the whole list would extend to. I'm guessing Schumer, Biden, Harris, (maybe) W. Bush would be some good starting points. Look for CEOs of big corporations also if the list is released. Furthermore, who has the files? The CIA or the DOJ?
Click to expand...
It’s already been established Bill Gates is on it which led to his divorce.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cod and Peradox1K
#6,681
#6,681
#6,682
#6,682
Jared Kushner invited convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to a party in 2013 that included a guest list of his father-in-law Donald Trump and producer Harvey Weinstein, who was not a convicted rapist at the time.

Kushner was owner of the New York Observer when Epstein received an email invite to the newspaper's 25th anniversary celebration on March 14, 2013. It is not clear if the financier attended.

'Mayor Michael Bloomberg will be by his side to toast you all,' read the email forwarded to Epstein by Kushner's assistant Lauren Groff.

His wife Ivanka and her father Donald Trump were included on the guest list, as were then-Newark Mayor Cory Booker, who was running for U.S. Senate at the time; actresses Blake Lively and Katie Holmes; fashion designer Carolina Herrera; and Weinstein's then-fashion designer wife Georgina Chapman.

www.dailymail.co.uk

Jared Kushner invited Jeffrey Epstein to star-studded NYC party

Jared Kushner invited sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to a party in 2013 that included a guest list of his father-in-law Donald Trump and Harvey Weinstein, who was later convicted of rape.
www.dailymail.co.uk www.dailymail.co.uk
 
#6,684
#6,684
FLVOL_79 said:
Have you not seen Trump losing his mind over this. Here he is calling his supporters foolish and stupid for wanting it released.

Click to expand...

Here's your first response to me. Sounds like you care. Sounds like you're kneeling in prayer hoping "you've got him now".

Like I said, when the dems had all the cards, you were silent. Now you're obsessing over it with your liberal buddies.
 
#6,686
#6,686
One point to also make is that the Congressional resolution is not necessary. Trump could order it all released right now without that resolution.

Which begs two questions:

If he's saying to vote for it and sign it why hasn't he just released it?

What's going to be in the resolution that he uses to hang up actual disclosure of all the files?
 
#6,691
#6,691
lawgator1 said:
One point to also make is that the Congressional resolution is not necessary. Trump could order it all released right now without that resolution.

Which begs two questions:

If he's saying to vote for it and sign it why hasn't he just released it?

What's going to be in the resolution that he uses to hang up actual disclosure of all the files?
Click to expand...

My wild azz guess is that when some very prominent democrats and other opponents are implicated he can say, I tried to get y'all to move past this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeburst and LSU-SIU
#6,695
#6,695
While Trump said Monday he was willing to sign the discharge petition in its current form, Johnson warned Tuesday morning that it would “carelessly dump thousands of documents without proper protections for the innocent.”


“It is dangerously flawed,” Johnson told reporters on Capitol Hill, before urging Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) to fix its issues. “Our problem and our frustration is, there’s no way for us in the House to amend it or correct these problems because the authors of the discharge will not allow it.”


nypost.com

House votes to force Epstein files release — but Johnson urges Senate to ‘correct’ issues

Johnson cited the resolution’s failure “to fully protect victim privacy.”
nypost.com nypost.com
 
#6,698
#6,698
lawgator1 said:
One point to also make is that the Congressional resolution is not necessary. Trump could order it all released right now without that resolution.

Which begs two questions:

If he's saying to vote for it and sign it why hasn't he just released it?

What's going to be in the resolution that he uses to hang up actual disclosure of all the files?
Click to expand...
Already testing your spin material.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU, StarRaider and Orangeburst
#6,700
#6,700
FLVOL_79 said:
Fiscal conservative. The jesus social issues are for the nutters.
Click to expand...
I could care less how much they spend they are going to do it anyway and get rich while doing it. Then you should agree there is to many government employees and people who chose to live off the government.

Guess I’m a nutter. Can’t vote for a party who thinks you can kill a baby up to birth. Can’t vote for a party who thinks you can change sex. Cant vote for a party who thinks it’s ok to let all these illegals in so they can stay in power by messing with the census. That’s why the Democrats want all these illegals in the country
 
New posts
You must log in or register to reply here.
Advertisement





Back
Top