treecejc
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Oct 6, 2013
- Messages
- 610
- Likes
- 1,072
I agree he should have been playing way before the last game, for the reasons you stated and also QB play was not exactly great either.
I just don’t think 1 game, or in the case of Gmac one quarter, is an indicator of how well they are going to do the next year.
You’re not hiring Golesh to take over a big time program and expecting the program to take a step to the next level. You hire someone like him for a rebuild.
If Heupel left for a better job, you get to look for a top tier of candidates. Not a bunch of mid major guys who are walking into a situation where everything is stable.
Coaches are hired to win games. Not throw in the towel and start playing freshmanNico should have been starting the minute the season ended in 2023 with our loss at Bama. We were out of contention for the SEC East and the playoff.
But for his first year of starting and game experience, he was 11-3 as the starter. There was a lot of things that gave promise to his future considering he had 3 years of eligibility left. No one was expecting Heisman level his first year of starting.
If there is a top tier candidate out that person is going to LSU. If LSU were to take Heupel, then that says he is a TOP TIER candidate.
Coaches are hired to win games. Not throw in the towel and start playing freshman
The rumors are he’s willing to talk.I myself hope it’s a Mike Gundy get a raise kind of thing.I have been a Vol fan all my life. But dang n it, if we run Heupel off; I may just be done as a fan. It is one thing for a fan base to be passionate; but it is another thing entirely to be idiotic and ungrateful.
How many teams do you see doing this? The answer is noneIf our QB play sucks next year or we are a middle tier team, I look forward to all the folks saying they were glad “we could pad stats in meaningless games last year instead of seeing if the future QB’s had anything to build on”
But once again, it’s hilarious to me that a big swath of people think Heupel is incapable of building a gameplan with a 4 and 5 star QB room with 2 weeks lead time against a C-USA team.
So many Heupel doubters apparently.
Have you ever seen a Tennessee coaching search? Might as well mark the top five off the list.Who LSU hires doesn’t matter here.
I’m addressing the people who think Golesh should be the guy to take over if Heupel was to leave for any job. It’s dumb. You’re not collecting $6-8m from Heupel if he chooses to leave and hire Golesh.
He’d be in so over his head here where the coach would be expected to contend for the playoffs right away.
He is the type of coach that needs a 3-5 year runway to build a program. That’s not what Tennessee would be if Heupel left for LSU or any other job out there.
Josephs and Brazzel both have a chance. Either way that's 4 players drafted in the first 2 rounds. Been a VERY long time since we've seen that. And that is a sure fire way to show the talent gap has closed.I doubt any end up 1st Rd picks. Nobody outside of maybe Hood and McCoy even have a chance at being 1st rounders and I'd be shocked if either was.
How many teams do you see doing this? The answer is none
Have you ever seen a Tennessee coaching search? Might as well mark the top five off the list.
Tennessee has never been in the position I’m describing. Even when Lane left, it was so late in the cycle that even the guys we did want, we tried to jam them up because of assistant coach buyouts we didn’t want to pay.
Heupel leaving means we collect $6-8 million from the second he signs with another school.
