Jefferey Epstein found dead in jail cell


^^^^ Those e-mails being discovered by Attorney General, Pam Bondi, led to a jail interview being conducted by Department of Justice officials with Ghislaine Maxwell. ^^^^



^^^^ AFTER the DOJ's interview with Ghislaine Maxwell, we learn about this. ^^^^


I'm sure that Ghislaine Maxwell will be releasing a public statement soon through the Attorney General, Pam Bondi, and the DOJ (of course) which will exonerate Donald Trump of any wrongdoing, including any knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's sexual misconduct with underage girls. Ghislaine Maxwell will dismiss Epstein's e-mails as being lies.

This is as predictable as the end of an episode of Scooby Doo.
Yep, it's a big nothing burger. It's another attempt to get Trump. Attempt ten thousand and one by my count
 
No, they didn't release complete emails. Your link states that.
My link states this............
That email exchange -- which came just weeks after a British newspaper published a series of stories about Epstein, Maxwell and their powerful associates -- was one of three released by the Democrats from a batch of more than 23,000 documents the committee recently received from the Epstein Estate in response to a subpoena.
 
These emails were in the possession of the House Oversight committee who recently received them from the JE estate.
Fine ... my mistake.

My main point still holds, however. During the 2024 Presidential Election Campaign, Donald Trump pledged to the American people that he would release all documents relevant to the crimes, investigations and court cases involving Jeffrey Epstein to the public (with some necessary redactions). He has not done that at all.
 
My link states this............
That email exchange -- which came just weeks after a British newspaper published a series of stories about Epstein, Maxwell and their powerful associates -- was one of three released by the Democrats from a batch of more than 23,000 documents the committee recently received from the Epstein Estate in response to a subpoena.

I just posted a quote from your link that explicitly states:

The full context of these email exchanges is not clear from the portions released by the committee Democrats.
 
From your link:



They didn't release the emails, they released snippets of a few select emails.

The full context of these email exchanges is not clear from the portions released by the committee Democrats.

The quote means that you could not get full context from these 3 emails....you would need more emails to provide full context.
Not that only parts of particular emails were released.

Go back and re-read. They even show the emails
 
Emails look pretty bad, but it seems like they aren't telling the whole story. Democrats are editing out information themselves in those emails. info that hurts their Trump is a pedo argument.

"The email with Giuffre's name unredacted was provided to ABC News by Republicans on the House Oversight Committee."

""Why did Democrats cover up the name when the Estate didn't redact it in the redacted documents provided to the committee?" the Republicans' posted on X. "It's because this victim, Virginia Giuffre, publicly said that she never witnessed wrongdoing by President Trump. Democrats are trying to create a fake narrative to slander President Trump. Shame on them.""
 
Fine ... my mistake.

My main point still holds, however. During the 2024 Presidential Election Campaign, Donald Trump pledged to the American people that he would release all documents relevant to the crimes, investigations and court cases involving Jeffrey Epstein to the public (with some necessary redactions). He has not done that at all.

I 100% support any and all criticism of Trump for not making everything he can transparent and a part of the public record. He deserves it.
 
Yep, it's a big nothing burger. It's another attempt to get Trump. Attempt ten thousand and one by my count
If Trump had been transparent with the Epstein files? It would be a nothing burger.

I don't care what the Trump minions call it .... Trump's behavior when asked about releasing the Epstein files has been suspicious. He gets angry. Why? Releasing those files was a campaign pledge of his. Why get mad now, whenever the Epstein files are even mentioned?
 
The full context of these email exchanges is not clear from the portions released by the committee Democrats.

The quote means that you could not get full context from these 3 emails....you would need more emails to provide full context.
Not that only parts of particular emails were released.

Go back and re-read. They even show the emails

No, that is not what it means. It means that you cannot get the full context from the portions of the emails that were released. Meaning that they did not release the full email or the entire chain of emails.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LSU-SIU
I 100% support any and all criticism of Trump for not making everything he can transparent and a part of the public record. He deserves it.
If he's innocent- which I believe he is- he'd do way better to just release it all.

He won't do it because it implicates some serious donors and actors in our political system.

This is what he gets for being nutless.
 
If Trump had been transparent with the Epstein files? It would be a nothing burger.

I don't care what the Trump minions call it .... Trump's behavior when asked about releasing the Epstein files has been suspicious. He gets angry. Why? Releasing those files was a campaign pledge of his. Why get mad now, whenever the Epstein files are even mentioned?
No, it's still a nothing burger. You still don't have him. He's escaped your grasp again. You've cried wolf 1000 times too many
 
If he's innocent- which I believe he is- he'd do way better to just release it all.

He won't do it because it implicates some serious donors and actors in our political system.

This is what he gets for being nutless.

The records go way beyond implicating donors and political heavyweights. They probably implicate domestic and foreign intelligence agencies and international financial moguls.
 
No small part of the irony here, is that Donald Trump campaigned on having full transparency with the Epstein files. Trump talked about it frequently during his rallies in 2024 .... and always with a subtle inference that a full disclosure of the Epstein files would be damaging to democrats.
Got him this time!
 
Leavitt is shameless lol



It must suck to be a mindless suck-up like her... Leavitt's whole existence is based upon simply repeating the bald-faced lies of the Orange Menace. YOU GO SAY WHAT I WANT YOU TO SAY OR ELSE YOU'RE FIRED!!!

But then again, she clearly has no conscience, so ignorance is bliss...

In the grand scheme of things, the alternative job is she's turning tricks down on Main and Constitution.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luthervol
How is this not suspicious behavior?

There is three real possibilities 1.) there is real evidence as to trump 2.) there is national security issues on a massive scale 3.) both.

I think everything should be released but last time I called for this for instance in the Ukraine everyone about blew their top.

My "guess", not a fact, is if everything was release - you'll be one of the first ones to be crying.
 
For the record I really don't care what happens to Trump, if he did abuse women or even worse kids, or him under the jail I don't care.

But I don't think there's anything of substance here, mainly because the info we have has been in our possession for multiple administrations. I simply can't envision a scenario where an administration(s) that had this evidence would bypass damning low hanging fruit like that.

It makes zero sense. If there's anything of substance I'd be very surprised.
 

View attachment 785430

That pic of Clooney is hilarious there, but should have gone with something from Burn After Reading


1762980718359.png
 
  • Like
Reactions: rekinhavoc
Advertisement





Back
Top