Vol8188
revolUTion in the air!
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2011
- Messages
- 55,077
- Likes
- 55,264
I believe that it means the government can tax to provide for the "general welfare" of the united states as long as it is applied equally across the country.
We are currently in a Democratic Socialist political system supported by a capitalistic economic system.
I want to reverse that trend of DS. Others want to hasten it. If you want it, fund it privately. No one is stopping anyone from pooling their resources to make others secure and "happy".
Rand Paul and Massey don't count since you guys constantly threaten to unseat them for not being MAGA enough for you.


Incorrect.
Especially with a company like TSMC who's best interest it is to move production outside of Taiwan given that China will most assuredly invade them before the end of the decade.
You should probably get out and travel more, my friend.Guess what else those countries have or don't have that figure into that "happiness"?
Also some of those countries have citizens that define getting C+ healthcare paid for free as happy, because they've never experienced better, which is why this is flawed to begin with.
If I grew up as a Louisiana Monroe football fan, and never experienced being a Tennessee fan, I would accept being 8-4 in the Sun Belt and having 22k fans in a stadium as being "happy and content" but I'd never have an actual clue how much better it is at Tennessee all the way around if I didnt experience it myself
Did you read the post I was responding to?Here was you carrying the water for the Biden admin for those noted Taiwanese firms Intel and Samsung...
Not a peep from you with the hundreds of billions of subsidies+ with IRA
Either you are for corp welfare or against it. It shouldnt depend on the admin giving it out...

