New York City

#7,151
#7,151
KB5252 said:
Do you really?

I got no time off. Even if I did, all these years later (my daughter is in college now, studying to be a teacher) I'm worse of than I was when she was 3, because of Obama, because of Trump, because of Biden...... And Trump again, and those that came before............ Nothing has really changed except in your partisan mind because Democrats have to be better right?


Same effing turd sandwich I've been fed since the nineties at least. I see it for what it is. Pretend one turd stinks less than the other......... It's still an effing turd.
Click to expand...
As a father/grandfather who has changed thousands of diapers, I can guarantee you that all turds are not equal; not even close.
 
#7,154
#7,154
NashVol11 said:
It's not misleading. If you fill in the oval for Zohran, whether you pick one or do both, he gets one vote. It doesn't grant any political cover whatsoever.

I ignored most of it because it read as just throwing theoretical things at the wall, focused on poking nonsensical holes rather than even trying to understand how the system actually works. "The very basics of data collection" culminating in a point that a full ONE THIRD of voters won't know any candidate and will just randomly make the ballot into a coloring book, or something, is a good example of that
Click to expand...
why not just have his name once, with the two parties behind/below his name? that would be a far more accurate representation of what was going on.

you really need to go back and actually read what I said, instead of jumping to conclusions. the culminating point on the data collection was actually about the formatting of the ballot.

if you address any one point, explain to me how its an unbiased system to break left to right, top to bottom in the formatting?

or there was even the point I raised that I admitted may not be nefarious, but without information on how the order was determined, the fact that two people had their name twice before 3 candidates had theirs once seems slanted on its face.

those are just two basic, objective items, that you haven't addressed with this version of fusion voting.
 
#7,160
#7,160
luthervol said:
The right uses social media for propagandizing to a far greater extent.
trump is more divisive than any previous president.
trump lies more.
trump is less civil to those who disagree
as a starter...........
Click to expand...
Replace Trump with Obama above and you have it just about right.
 
#7,161
#7,161
LouderVol said:
why not just have his name once, with the two parties behind/below his name? that would be a far more accurate representation of what was going on.

you really need to go back and actually read what I said, instead of jumping to conclusions. the culminating point on the data collection was actually about the formatting of the ballot.

if you address any one point, explain to me how its an unbiased system to break left to right, top to bottom in the formatting?

or there was even the point I raised that I admitted may not be nefarious, but without information on how the order was determined, the fact that two people had their name twice before 3 candidates had theirs once seems slanted on its face.

those are just two basic, objective items, that you haven't addressed with this version of fusion voting.
Click to expand...
It IS slanted. There is no 'seems' to it. It's a new ****ing way of cheating.
 
#7,167
#7,167
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
#7,174
#7,174
RDU VOL#14 said:
This is pretty much the equivalent of a resignation letter or a subtle way of letting people know that she wants to be working exclusively with Kelsey Grammer. Surprised to see her go off script.
Click to expand...
Her rally cry has always been LGBTQ. She likes her money.
 
#7,175
#7,175
RDU VOL#14 said:
I’ve seen so many videos of stupid people this past week it’s very difficult to distinguish who is joking and who is being serious.
Click to expand...
IMO, if you recognize that an Islamic caliphate of NYC is hilariously outside of the realm of possibility, it is a very obvious joke. If your (not you specifically) view of Muslims is such that you think it is within the realm of possibility, then you might not see the joke. People are revealing what their views of Muslim candidates are
 
New Posts
You must log in or register to reply here.

Advertisement



Back
Top