C-south
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Sep 15, 2018
- Messages
- 34,379
- Likes
- 59,936
both in this election and the historical norm, those are pitiful numbers. Even worse than national elections for the country. Roughly 50-60% of eligible voters cast ballots in national electons. the number of people who do not vote is roughly double the number of those who vote for any of two main candidates.Based on the last few mayoral elections, 1.15-1.2M total votes
"Even worse than national elections" is a weird way to phrase that, because of course turnout is higher for national elections. A mayoral race in an off year got almost as many NYC voters as the 2024 presidential electionboth in this election and the historical norm, those are pitiful numbers. Even worse than national elections for the country. Roughly 50-60% of eligible voters cast ballots in national electons. the number of people who do not vote is roughly double the number of those who vote for any of two main candidates.
Local elections always have lower turnouts. Presidential elections usually drive higher, though still pathetic, turnout levels.both in this election and the historical norm, those are pitiful numbers. Even worse than national elections for the country. Roughly 50-60% of eligible voters cast ballots in national electons. the number of people who do not vote is roughly double the number of those who vote for any of two main candidates.
I think it is only weird if you have some agenda with the observation. National election turnout is weak. NYC mayoral elections are weaker. It's a sad reality."Even worse than national elections" is a weird way to phrase that, because of course turnout is higher for national elections. A mayoral race in an off year got almost as many NYC voters as the 2024 presidential election
View attachment 787664
“You maniacs! “
Live feed from Manhattan this morning
View attachment 787665
Man has been fantasizing about NYC's demise for a solid hourHudson River a few minutes ago……
View attachment 787674
Why do people not ask these questions BEFORE taking Elon at face value? It's always "Elon said it's weird, so now I also think so until I see proof otherwise." No, first look for proof that he isn't FOS, because he almost always isis it usual for candidates to be listed twice?
how is that calculated?
Do they add the Mamdani (D) votes to his Mamdani (A) votes?
seems misleading at worst, and confusing at best.
Didn’t know seems means that it is. Thought seems means could be. You still haven’t been proved right but are just going on and on for your socialistYou started going, "really?? This seems scary!" And it was the dumbest online rage bait that a second grader could see through, you proved me right yourself by apparently falling for that garbage
I had a poor assumption about the nyc mayoral race. I guess because there was so much attention given, i thought the voters were more energized. They were compared to history. But only about 1M of 7M voted for The Zohan.Local elections always have lower turnouts. Presidential elections usually drive higher, though still pathetic, turnout levels.
What I saw of Europe was in pretty good shape the last time I was there. Other than pickpockets in a few places and petty theft, crime's less of a concern in their cities than ours. Sorry I didn't see or hear of any really scary stuff to report.Europe says HI!!! and U.S. is well down the same path. Europe will eventually collapse in most of our lifetimes.
![]()
If you think it could be scary that a Zohran intern said "jihad" (because what? Zohran is secretly a terrorist who's going to kill everyone?), then you should be less gullibleDidn’t know seems means that it is. Thought seems means could be. You still haven’t been proved right but are just going on and on for your socialist
sounds like bs to me. and bs that puts party over candidate.No, you just don't know how voting works. You'll be alright. Look up fusion voting and maybe you'll whine less
Funding is often tied to the percentage of the vote a party receives, I don't get why this is supposed to be nefarioussounds like bs to me. and bs that puts party over candidate.
Fusion voting puts the emphasis of the benefit as being for the parties, not the individual voters, or even the one elected.
that is assbackwards imo.
and I really don't see how it helps the smaller "fusing" party. its not like if Mamdani (D) gets 20% of his total votes that Mamdani is magically going to do what they want 20% of the time.
I was in a couple of large cities in Europe 2 months ago and had a blast. The pearl clutching is funny to meWhat I saw of Europe was in pretty good shape the last time I was there. Other than pickpockets in a few places and petty theft, crime's less of a concern in their cities than ours. Sorry I didn't see or hear of any really scary stuff to report.
