Mullins2010
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- Jan 28, 2010
- Messages
- 5,846
- Likes
- 11,325
Assuming we blow out nmsu in a couple of week, merk doesn’t need to see a snap, only gmac after aguilar
Would this surprise anyone at this point? Hell, a lot of people on here are wanting to ship him off anyway.
She sat her for the first half. It was for a very minor infraction (maybe late to class or something similar). All of Chicago was there to see Candace play…..What’d she do? View attachment 787126
I don't think it's true about the LSU interest, but Heupel has been as successful here as Lane has been at OM. So if Lane is such a hot commodity, it's not that hard to believe someone might be interested in Heupel. I just think Heupel is pretty entrenched here, so why make what amounts to a lateral move?I don’t buy it. The LSU faithful wouldn’t go for this one bit. I’m of the camp that Heupel can get it done with the right staff, but even I acknowledge that Heupel hasn’t won enough here for LSU to come calling. I could honestly see him being called by a VT or an Auburn type program, but not LSU. He’ll be our coach in 2026.
Do you fire you coach if he only gets 8 with a 9 game SEC schedule and misses CFP is the question?9-10 wins gets in the playoffs when it expands and with the new schedules. Sign me up for 9-10 wins instead of coach searching.
It’s all about marketing. Lane markets himself as a winner and a mouthy jock type. Heupel is more of an introverted nerd. I prefer the latter myself, but even I acknowledge having someone like Lane as the front man can be fun.I don't think it's true about the LSU interest, but Heupel has been as successful here as Lane has been at OM. So if Lane is such a hot commodity, it's not that hard to believe someone might be interested in Heupel. I just think Heupel is pretty entrenched here, so why make what amounts to a lateral move?
