Film Guy’s message to some of you

#3
#3
Brooks sees it very clearly in the film. Heupel is an offensive mastermind who creates all sorts of opportunities for his players to succeed. They just need to execute. The careless INTs, unfortunate fumbles, missed kicks, dumb penalties, is a lack of execution. They are correctable. But replacing one of the best offensive playcallers in college football is not a path anyone wants to go down. We really need to shame the idiots who think otherwise.
 
#4
#4
Brooks sees it very clearly in the film. Heupel is an offensive mastermind who creates all sorts of opportunities for his players to succeed. They just need to execute. The careless INTs, unfortunate fumbles, missed kicks, dumb penalties, is a lack of execution. They are correctable. But replacing one of the best offensive playcallers in college football is not a path anyone wants to go down. We really need to shame the idiots who think otherwise.
Unfortunately, In today's society,shame and ignorance seem to be a badge of honor. It's seen as a flex when it used to be ridiculed and derided for the utter stupidity.
We,as a society, have lost the ability to tell stupid people they are stupid.
We're living in the age of dunning kruger
 
#5
#5
Brooks sees it very clearly in the film. Heupel is an offensive mastermind who creates all sorts of opportunities for his players to succeed. They just need to execute. The careless INTs, unfortunate fumbles, missed kicks, dumb penalties, is a lack of execution. They are correctable. But replacing one of the best offensive playcallers in college football is not a path anyone wants to go down. We really need to shame the idiots who think otherwise.

Fumble 6 was a great playcall with Staley wide open to go up 14-0 and 200-20 yards in total domination but our young RT everybody’s been begging for didn’t touch the DE.
 
#6
#6
Fumble 6 was a great playcall with Staley wide open to go up 14-0 and 200-20 yards in total domination but our young RT everybody’s been begging for didn’t touch the DE.
Yep, he initially moved to double team the DT with our RG, then realized the edge rusher was blowing right by him. HOW....does he not pay complete attention to that edge rusher?? Huge mistake. I decided to make myself miserable this afternoon and go back and watch it play by play, pausing on a lot of plays. Stopped and started that play a half dozen times trying to figure out what he was thinking there.
 
#8
#8
Unfortunately, there is more to being a great head coach than just being a great offensive play designer. He needs to address the ineptitude on the defensive side of the ball and build a culture of discipline. He also needs to be better at clock management and stop going conservative every time we get a turnover. Very few times this season have we scored points off of a turnover unless it was a pick six or scoop and score. These are the issues he has to address if he wants to be a championship level coach.
 
#9
#9
Brooks sees it very clearly in the film. Heupel is an offensive mastermind who creates all sorts of opportunities for his players to succeed. They just need to execute. The careless INTs, unfortunate fumbles, missed kicks, dumb penalties, is a lack of execution. They are correctable. But replacing one of the best offensive playcallers in college football is not a path anyone wants to go down. We really need to shame the idiots who think otherwise.
And? Why recruit players that can't execute? Or need to be motivated? Or need to be developed for 4 years to be a role player.?


Or does the mastermind not concern himself with this?
 
#11
#11
It's silly to suggest getting rid of Heupel. It's not silly to suggest he should go DC shopping and see who's out there tearing it up on the defensive side of the coaching world (cough! Danny White! cough!). The lack of discipline, poor angles, poor tackling technique and overall missed assignments has become chronic. They played a better game than I thought they would, though. Offensive turnovers were needless and took their toll.
 
#16
#16
And? Why recruit players that can't execute? Or need to be motivated? Or need to be developed for 4 years to be a role player.?


Or does the mastermind not concern himself with this?
That us the exact reason why Heupel is a great coach. He has been limited to recruiting players of less talent, which is why they execute at a lesser degree. More talented players execute at a higher level. But we are slowly getting more and more talented recruits.
 
#17
#17
Unfortunately, In today's society,shame and ignorance seem to be a badge of honor. It's seen as a flex when it used to be ridiculed and derided for the utter stupidity.
We,as a society, have lost the ability to tell stupid people they are stupid.
We're living in the age of dunning kruger
You, sir, have better things to do than be here.

A Dunning Kruger reference here is the most pearls before swine comment I've ever seen on Volnation.

Please, for the good of your mind, log off and leave us in our drool.
 
#19
#19
Brooks sees it very clearly in the film. Heupel is an offensive mastermind who creates all sorts of opportunities for his players to succeed. They just need to execute. The careless INTs, unfortunate fumbles, missed kicks, dumb penalties, is a lack of execution. They are correctable. But replacing one of the best offensive playcallers in college football is not a path anyone wants to go down. We really need to shame the idiots who think otherwise.
All that genius makes no difference if he doesn't have a staff who can train and condition the players.
If the player's aren't being trained and conditioned properly, good play calls don't amount to a hill of beans.

You need assistants who can train players at every position..

If you don't and and you aren't willing to replace assistants who aren't producing expected results,
then you need to go.

Honestly, I'd rather have someone else who isn't afraid to replace staff when changes aren't needed,
than someone who can play call but can't make changes to better execute those plays.

Side Note... An offsensive genius should be able to make changes at half time... CJP does not...
 
  • Like
Reactions: MemphisVolFan1978
#20
#20
That ended up deciding the game. Some guys don't need to be playing college football let alone at this level.

100%. Not only took all of the momentum, but quite literally decided the game…without that busted play we at least get three there and win by 4 rather than lose by 6.
 
#22
#22
I wish ol Brooksie would actually explain to all of us why CJH makes the same mistakes over and over and we should be good with it. He has a hard on for Heupel. Funny how he thinks a 7 win team is subpar, when more tham likely... we are a 7 win team. You cant make this up. Stick to X's amd O's, Brooks.
 
#23
#23
Yep, he initially moved to double team the DT with our RG, then realized the edge rusher was blowing right by him. HOW....does he not pay complete attention to that edge rusher?? Huge mistake. I decided to make myself miserable this afternoon and go back and watch it play by play, pausing on a lot of plays. Stopped and started that play a half dozen times trying to figure out what he was thinking there.
The rush end was playing off the line a bit and delayed his rush just enough to trick Sanders. That's a true Freshman doing true Freshman things in only his 3rd start. You know he's played it over in his head 1,000 times. He is going to be elite.
 
Advertisement





Back
Top