Israel vs Palestinians II

Well the more you read up on the G-d of A. I, and J the more excited you’re going to be. We have a feast for everything.
Religiously speaking. We are the premier party people.

For example, Passover is coming up. Take part in the feast and see if you are not hammered at the end of it.

This is true. I might have posted this back in the summer but I went to a Jewish wedding in NYC this summer. At the after ceremony reception I said something about how much food was being served and a guy at the table said (paraphrasing) "Y'all have been trying to kill us off for thousands of years, we're still here so let's eat". It was one hell of a party even though it was segregated men in one ball room and women in the other.
 
This is true. I might have posted this back in the summer but I went to a Jewish wedding in NYC this summer. At the after ceremony reception I said something about how much food was being served and a guy at the table said (paraphrasing) "Y'all have been trying to kill us off for thousands of years, we're still here so let's eat". It was one hell of a party even though it was segregated men in one ball room and women in the other.
Every feast an be summed up “they tried to kill us, we won , let’s eat”
 
Jesus dude, I'm literally done interacting with you. I've attempted to be cool but I feel like all you do is argue and keep coming back for bites. I'm simply not going to discuss anything with you in good faith anymore.

Have a great one
Me: is looking at Muslims differently and being prejudiced against them right or wrong?

You: 900 words of nonsense without answering the question

Agree to disagree that that's "good faith"
 
[Politicians sign bombs destined for genocide]

Millions of Christian voters: I'm fine with my tax dollars funding that. Those women and children should've overthrown Hamas.

[Entertainer signs bomb destined for genocide]

Metal fans: we won't abide this evil

Screenshot_20251101-090240_Facebook.jpg
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
[Politicians sign bombs destined for genocide]

Millions of Christian voters: I'm fine with my tax dollars funding that. Those women and children should've overthrown Hamas.

[Entertainer signs bomb destined for genocide]

Metal fans: we won't abide this evil

View attachment 786597
Roger waters: “dirty Kike”
*met with silence*

yea interesting indeed
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
Me: is looking at Muslims differently and being prejudiced against them right or wrong?

You: 900 words of nonsense without answering the question

Agree to disagree that that's "good faith"
Me directly answering........... Because their religion, by the book, is incompatible with Western values.

You ignoring my response and calling it nonsense.

This is why I'm done. Have a good one man, no need to respond to me. I'm done but do as you wish.
 
Me directly answering........... Because their religion, by the book, is incompatible with Western values.

You ignoring my response and calling it nonsense.

This is why I'm done. Have a good one man, no need to respond to me. I'm done but do as you wish.
"Is it right or is it wrong"
"My answer is...because it is incompatible"

My question was never "why." This is my point exactly. "Because" is not a direct answer to "right or wrong" or "yes or no"
 
"Is it right or is it wrong"
"My answer is...because it is incompatible"

My question was never "why." This is my point exactly. "Because" is not a direct answer to "right or wrong" or "yes or no"
It's not right in all cases, you asked if Muslims get more discrimination n an earlier post, I answered yes in an earlier post. I'm giving you the why here.

This is exactly why I'm done with you. Because you ask the same things over and over again trying to frame the narrowest response possible so you can be right.

There is no right or wrong here, only the reality.

Just leave me the eff alone and I'll do the same. I'm done with you dude.

Whatever response you have from here will be ignored, I'm done trying to explain things that should be obvious to anyone, even if they disagree with me.

I see no intellectual honesty worth further discussion. Have a good day
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
It's not right in all cases, you asked if Muslims get more discrimination n an earlier post, I answered yes in an earlier post. I'm giving you the why here.

This is exactly why I'm done with you. Because you ask the same things over and over again trying to frame the narrowest response possible so you can be right.

There is no right or wrong here, only the reality.

Just leave me the eff alone and I'll do the same. I'm done with you dude.

Whatever response you have from here will be ignored, I'm done trying to explain things that should be obvious to anyone, even if they disagree with me.

I see no intellectual honesty worth further discussion. Have a good day
What’s funny is you’re the most reasonable guy on this board.
And even you can’t have a conversation with him
 
Here’s the evil words of the evil Jew front man for Disterbed.


“Once again we hear them calling for war
It doesn't matter what they're fighting for
They light the match and watch the whole world burst in the flame
The story's always the same
So tell me people are you ready to kill?
Behold the propaganda, get your fill
A distant enemy is threatening our freedom again
How much would you like to spend?
Millions are falling in line
And it's just a matter of time
Endless destruction will ensure their pockets are lined
For all time
No more defending the lies
Behind the never ending war
It's time to make them realize
We will no longer be their whore
No more, no more
No more, no more
No more, no more“



Lol
 
Jesus dude, I'm literally done interacting with you. I've attempted to be cool but I feel like all you do is argue and keep coming back for bites. I'm simply not going to discuss anything with you in good faith anymore.

Have a great one
Hate Trump. It's all he and Swampy have
 
  • Like
Reactions: whodeycin85
It's not right in all cases, you asked if Muslims get more discrimination n an earlier post, I answered yes in an earlier post. I'm giving you the why here.

This is exactly why I'm done with you. Because you ask the same things over and over again trying to frame the narrowest response possible so you can be right.

There is no right or wrong here, only the reality.

Just leave me the eff alone and I'll do the same. I'm done with you dude.

Whatever response you have from here will be ignored, I'm done trying to explain things that should be obvious to anyone, even if they disagree with me.

I see no intellectual honesty worth further discussion. Have a good day
I'm not trying to do anything but get a straight answer. I never asked why - not once. If I'm saying it was wrong to be prejudiced against Jews in the '30s, black people in the '50s, gay people in the '80s, I don't need someone to come explain to me "why" people were prejudiced. We all know that s**t and it has no bearing on whether that prejudice is right or wrong, unless you're implying that it's justified.

There will always be a reason why. Every period of prejudice against a particular group includes a "why". Usually it's "crime" or "national security" or somehow "coming for the women and children," including that gay/trans people were going to make your kid gay or trans. I'm asking you whether you buy the given "why" and think looking at Muslims differently is indeed justified.

It's a lot of this board, though. People will say that discrimination is bad but then will argue in favor of looking at Muslims differently. Which is it? Take a damn stand IMO, even if people simply said "yes I am prejudiced against Muslims" I would at least respect their honesty and self-awareness
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: n_huffhines
I view it differently than you, I try to be respectful towards all religions, even if I obviously disagree. I try to view historical people through the lens of their time.

But yes, Mohammed was a slaver and he would absolutely be considered a pedophile today.
Historical analyses of timelines and events in his and his youngest wife's lives indicate that she was late teens or older when the marriage was consummated. All his other wives had been married before, which doesn't indicate that he liked young girls. So it's unlikely that he'd be considered a pedophile today.
 
Historical analyses of timelines and events in his and his youngest wife's lives indicate that she was late teens or older when the marriage was consummated. All his other wives had been married before, which doesn't indicate that he liked young girls. So it's unlikely that he'd be considered a pedophile today.
Historical analysis shows the wife in question was around 9 to 12 years old when consummated. 12 being on the generous side.

The Koran states the marriage happened at 6 and was consummated at the age of 9. Do we believe what the Koran states or not?
 
Me directly answering........... Because their religion, by the book, is incompatible with Western values.

You ignoring my response and calling it nonsense.

This is why I'm done. Have a good one man, no need to respond to me. I'm done but do as you wish.
That implies other religions are compatible with Western values. What's the difference?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
That implies other religions are compatible with Western values. What's the difference?
While I concede there are issues with Hinduism and class there is no text that condones beating wives and children. The same cannot be said of Islam, beating children, wives and killing non believers is "of the book" it's there in ink with no text to disqualify it.
 
Historical analysis shows the wife in question was around 9 to 12 years old when consummated. 12 being on the generous side.
Not per what I've read. Below is one article, What analyses support the young age?


The Koran states the marriage happened at 6 and was consummated at the age of 9. Do we believe what the Koran states or not?
Where in the Koran does it say that?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
While I concede there are issues with Hinduism and class there is no text that condones beating wives and children. The same cannot be said of Islam, beating children, wives and killing non believers is "of the book" it's there in ink with no text to disqualify it.
What's the text that condones beating women and children, and killing non-believers (in context)?
 
  • Like
Reactions: NashVol11
According to the Hadith:

a recorded saying, action, or approval of the Prophet Muhammad, serving as the second most important source of Islamic law and guidance after the Qur'an. Muslims use hadith to understand and implement the teachings of the Qur'an in their daily lives and traditions. The authenticity of each hadith is judged by its chain of narrators (sanad) and the text itself (matn), with different categories like Sahih (authentic) and Da'if (weak).

The Quran does not state Aisha's age, but traditional Islamic sources, primarily through hadith, say she was six at the time of her marriage and nine when the marriage was consummated. These reports are considered a secondary source of scripture and are not found in the Quran itself. Modern scholars hold differing views on her age, with some questioning the reliability of the traditional reports.

But if you question the Hadith you are blasphemous.

You must either except the Koran and Hadith or reject it, rejecting it is considered Haram in Islam
 

Advertisement



Back
Top