SpaceCoastVol
Jacked up on moonshine and testosterone
- Joined
- Sep 10, 2009
- Messages
- 56,194
- Likes
- 70,355
LOL OKI like that yall don't even realize you have the worst kind of TDS. The cuck version from so much boot licking. Just please be careful and make sure the boot licking isn't after Trump goes #2! Don't want yall getting pink eye!
View attachment 786010
Nice try, but do you think there is any logical argument they will agree to? Trump bad. Trump screwing black folk. Muh.you and your significant other own a car together. it breaks down, it needs more work done on it than you can already afford. this is your only car, without it you aren't getting food, you aren't getting to work, and it really messes up both of your lives.
you want to get work done that will let the car run again, even though its more than you can afford.
your partner wants to spent about 33% more on a whole bunch of things that won't help you get food, get to work, or generally help you live your lives.
remember that you are holding on getting the car running, and take care of the other things after the car is running. your partner wants to hold up a running car and a normal life to get some padded seats put in.
yall are in a disagreement about what should be done. which one of you is being reasonable? which one is in need of compromising?
I have no interest in playing dress up politician. Im happy to just call balls and strikes from the sideline.Republicans want nothing from the Dems, hence there's nothing to negotiate. But let's have some fun.
Let's negotiate here. You play the Dems. You say to me "I want $1.5T more in spending". What are you going to offer me to entice me to grant you that spending?
This is nothing like the present budget issue.you and your significant other own a car together. it breaks down, it needs more work done on it than you can already afford. this is your only car, without it you aren't getting food, you aren't getting to work, and it really messes up both of your lives.
you want to get work done that will let the car run again, even though its more than you can afford.
your partner wants to spent about 33% more on a whole bunch of things that won't help you get food, get to work, or generally help you live your lives.
remember that you are holding on getting the car running, and take care of the other things after the car is running. your partner wants to hold up a running car and a normal life to get some padded seats put in.
yall are in a disagreement about what should be done. which one of you is being reasonable? which one is in need of compromising?
Fair enough. When the Dems say “they won’t negotiate “ the devil is in the details. There’s nothing to negotiate unless both sides want something. There’s nothing for the Republicans to gain in negotiationsI have no interest in playing dress up politician. Im happy to just call balls and strikes from the sideline.

![]()
Washington Post Editorial Blames Left for Shutdown, EBT Disruption: 'It Is Wrong... Democrats Have Held the Government Hostage'
The Washington Post editorial board wrote Wednesday that Congress should fund the government for a full year, as otherwise families could "go hungry" as key programs such as food stamps may soon expire.www.breitbart.com
thats why I said both of you couldn't afford what is needed. "t breaks down, it needs more work done on it than you can already afford"This is nothing like the present budget issue.
The GOP is spending like drunken sailors on what it wants with the boys and trying not to pay the health insurance premiums cause the wife and kids can fend for themselves. Your analogy might be convincing if the GOP had a modicum of fiscal conservatism left.
using government employee pay and military as "leverage". I mean that just sums it all up doesn't it. People can't pay bills but thank God the Democrats have "leverage" for whatever.Fact is, GOP has flatly refused to negotiate. If you believe the GOP will negotiate with the Dems once they give up their leverage, then bless your heart.
