They do have money issues. You can research it yourself or not. Don’t care. That doesn’t preclude someone paying off their tab for a coach if true.You said they have money issues, yet 1 donor is going to pay the bulk of the buyout..... Quite clearly they don't have issues drumming the money up.
Just take the L and move on. Money is not going to be the reason LSU loses out on a coach.
None of that has anything to do with what I said. They can clearly drum up whatever amount of money they need to.They do have money issues. You can research it yourself or not. Don’t care. That doesn’t preclude someone paying off their tab for a coach if true.
These are the facts:
1)LSU athletic dept is currently in the red
2) The School (education side) is making cuts
3) Louisiana demographics are not in good shape
I have no idea what will happen and have not claimed so. I only challenged that popular perception may not be reality as far as the state of the program. Hell they may come out smelling like roses for all I know. NIL is changing the college landscape rapidly and none know how it’s going to shape out so I’m skeptical of any perception that relies on the SEC of 2015 paradigm.
Louisiana has world class high-school talent but I can envision a world in which recruiting becomes “a” factor and not “the “ factor. The future seems likely to reward coaches that can evaluate talent and manage rosters via NIL/transfer portal.
None of that has anything to do with what I said. They can clearly drum up whatever amount of money they need to.
Your original statement in this thread was that LSU was broke and implied they won't have the money to get who they want. And somehow, you are still trying to defend such an ignorant statement.
This is the original quote to which you’re referring. What does I don’t know mean in your world? In my world it means that maybe they can or maybe not. They are broke and operating in the red. That is a fact. Maybe they come through, maybe not. I don’t know.I think the paradigm is shifting on that. It’s about NIL and Louisiana doesn’t have the billionaires that Texas, Florida, Georgia and Tennessee have. This 54 million buyout is going to hurt and possibly set back the program. I don’t know if they can afford top dollar for a coach.
They are hardly "broke." They operated at about an $800k deficit last year after years of generating large profits and sending a bunch of it to the academic side of the house.This is the original quote to which you’re referring. What does I don’t know mean in your world? In my world it means that maybe they can or maybe not. They are broke and operating in the red. That is a fact. Maybe they come through, maybe not. I don’t know.
Yep..broke is probably too strong of a word especially if getting bailed out comes to fruition.They are hardly "broke." They operated at about an $800k deficit last year after years of generating large profits and sending a bunch of it to the academic side of the house.
If they have large donors that are willing to cover the buyouts, the current state of finances for their AD is kind of irrelevant anyway.
They do have money issues. You can research it yourself or not. Don’t care. That doesn’t preclude someone paying off their tab for a coach if true.
These are the facts:
1)LSU athletic dept is currently in the red
2) The School (education side) is making cuts
3) Louisiana demographics are not in good shape
I have no idea what will happen and have not claimed so. I only challenged that popular perception may not be reality as far as the state of the program. Hell they may come out smelling like roses for all I know. NIL is changing the college landscape rapidly and none know how it’s going to shape out so I’m skeptical of any perception that relies on the SEC of 2015 paradigm.
Louisiana has world class high-school talent but I can envision a world in which recruiting becomes “a” factor and not “the “ factor. The future seems likely to reward coaches that can evaluate talent and manage rosters via NIL/transfer portal.
That's a fair approach. But Saban still knew the playing field was evening out. His reign of dominance was going to take a hit. Not a steep drop off, but it would take a hit.After NIL and the Portal became a thing in 2021, Saban went 36-6 with 2 CFP appearances and didn't have a finish outside the top 5.
It's quite possible he said "I'm 71; I don't want to deal with this new crap" and that pushed him into retirement, but he coached for 3 years in the Portal/NIL world before stepping out. One thing that he undoubtedly did benefit from, but the benefit would have continued as long as decided to keep coaching, was that guys took NIL discounts for the chance to play for him.
There probably wasn't a more adaptable coach during the time that he was coaching (or maybe ever) than Saban. I know he has critiqued the current state of the game since retiring, but I think the main driving force behind him hanging it up was simply his age - people forget he was 71. If he was working a cush white collar office job, people would be like "I wonder when he's going to retire?"That's a fair approach. But Saban still knew the playing field was evening out. His reign of dominance was going to take a hit. Not a steep drop off, but it would take a hit.
His ego wouldn't let him continue to coach.
