Israel vs Palestinians II

View attachment 785149🚨 BREAKING - Numbers are in and confirmed.

Most accurate and precise war in modern history, Israeli soldiers sacrificed their own lives to save Gazan civilians and of course, no genocide:

“Using Hamas’s own statistics, and subtracting natural deaths and fatalities caused by munitions fired by Gazan combatants, one gets a total of about 33,000 civilian casualties. The widely accepted number of combatant casualties is at about 25,000.

Every one of those 33,000 civilian casualties is a tragedy and a testament to the effectiveness and ruthlessness of Hamas’s human-shield strategy. That number also means that there are fewer than 1.5 civilian deaths for each combatant war death.

A genocide didn’t happen—that we knew a long time ago. But it is now clear that there is no plausible case that Israel used excessive force against civilians or targeted noncombatants.

The opposite is true: In pursuing Hamas, Israeli soldiers sacrificed their own lives to protect civilians. This is not an interpretation of some contextless video floating around social media; this is established fact.”
2.2 million Arabs (Palestinians) living in peace as citizens of Israel, who were also being targeted by Hamas and defended by the IDF, collectively say the Genocide narrative is bull **** and the people making that claim are simply Hamas supporters.
 
Carful
I lost a significant amount of my family tree there.
I’m not sure anyone with a soul would describe the feeling in the air there with “peace “
Its a paradoy of Mandelas grand kids talking about something they hardly know anything about or experienced and Israel trying to spin it..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Orangeslice13
View attachment 785149🚨 BREAKING - Numbers are in and confirmed.

Most accurate and precise war in modern history, Israeli soldiers sacrificed their own lives to save Gazan civilians and of course, no genocide:

“Using Hamas’s own statistics, and subtracting natural deaths and fatalities caused by munitions fired by Gazan combatants, one gets a total of about 33,000 civilian casualties. The widely accepted number of combatant casualties is at about 25,000.

Every one of those 33,000 civilian casualties is a tragedy and a testament to the effectiveness and ruthlessness of Hamas’s human-shield strategy. That number also means that there are fewer than 1.5 civilian deaths for each combatant war death.

A genocide didn’t happen—that we knew a long time ago. But it is now clear that there is no plausible case that Israel used excessive force against civilians or targeted noncombatants.

The opposite is true: In pursuing Hamas, Israeli soldiers sacrificed their own lives to protect civilians. This is not an interpretation of some contextless video floating around social media; this is established fact.”
Commentary Magazine's not at all slanted is it?
 
Undercutting our own investigation to appease Israel

Colonel Gabavics said he concluded the shooting was deliberate based on several factors:

  • Records of Israeli military radio traffic on the morning before the shooting showed that soldiers were aware of journalists in the area, he said. And there had been no gunfire coming from the journalists’ direction that might make the Israeli soldiers likely to shoot toward them in self-defense, he said.
  • There was an Israeli military vehicle down the road from Ms. Abu Akleh that morning. A sniper watching the road from inside the vehicle would have been able to see the journalists clearly, Colonel Gabavics said.
  • When he visited the scene of the shooting hours after it occurred, he said, his colleagues, wearing blue vests similar to Ms. Abu Akleh’s navy-blue protective vest marked “Press,” positioned themselves where she had fallen. They were visible to him from where the shooter’s vehicle had been, he said.
Colonel Gabavics said that the precision of the shots, hitting Ms. Abu Akleh’s head and a carob tree near her, did not suggest an uncontrolled spray of gunfire. That, together with the fact that the shooter fired first at Ms. Abu Akleh’s producer, then at her, then at a passerby who tried to help, indicated to him the shooting was deliberate, he said.
For the shooting to be accidental, “the most absurd thing in the world” would have had to happen, he said. “The individual popped out of the truck, just was randomly shooting, and happened to have really well-aimed shots and never looked down the scope. Which wouldn’t have happened,” he said.
 
  • Like
Reactions: EasternVol
The silence about this from those who rightfully highlighted the plight of American hostages in Gaza is notable, like there's a double standard in play.

Once again, Al Jazeera has been caught in a lie.

What else is Al Jazeera lying about?



HonestReporting EXCLUSIVE: Shireen Abu Akleh Death ‘Witness’ Turns Out To Be Islamic Jihad Terrorist​



IMG_9935.jpeg


 
Advertisement





Back
Top