New York City

Youre making a bunch of stuff up, no surprise there

We were attacked because of U.S. foreign policy, not for being "infidels" or some stupid BS

Zohran isn't a "zealot" even remotely

Muslims aren't "the enemy," that's ridiculous

Thankfully NYC isn't as spineless and bigoted as you are
LOL You are exactly what you accuse others of being.
 
iu
 
You still don't know what words mean. Stereotyping and bigotry apply to both race and religion, acting like only one is bad is unbelievably stupid

But race and religion are two different things, which is what I had to explain to you. Not a surprise, though.

Projection won't expand your vocabulary

Projection appears to be yet another word you struggle to define.

And the Nazis who committed the Holocaust were white, probably like you! What a meaningful point!

You picked a bad example because of your ignorance, which is understandable. There’s a difference when a minority is responsible for an issue, something that everyone but you is capable of recognizing.

Already covered above, holding 2 billion Muslims responsible for 9/11 for eternity is as room temperature IQ as it gets

Eternity != 24 years, and you’ve again failed to point out how the fact is distorted. We all know why, though.
 
But race and religion are two different things, which is what I had to explain to you. Not a surprise, though.
Which makes no difference in a conversation about bigotry, you brought that up for no reason and still don't get it but are somehow gloating
Projection appears to be yet another word you struggle to define.
You keep showing you don't know what bigotry means, maybe take a break from this
You picked a bad example because of your ignorance, which is understandable. There’s a difference when a minority is responsible for an issue, something that everyone but you is capable of recognizing.
Al-Qaeda is a minority of Islam, dumbass. How stupid are you?
Eternity != 24 years, and you’ve again failed to point out how the fact is distorted. We all know why, though.
24 years is a long time, and it seems you simply didn't understand the explanation
 
We were all (hopefully) raised to believe that racism is bad, and the argument today is that it's okay to employ those same racist and prejudiced attitudes toward Muslims. In fact, you're "spineless" if you AREN'T openly prejudiced. Stunning that this is a real conversation
 
Adult Language Warning .... Caution .... Caution .... Adult language warning.
A lunatic lib can't control himself while being out in public as usual.

 
Last edited:
Which makes no difference in a conversation about bigotry, you brought that up for no reason and still don't get it but are somehow gloating

It highlights your misunderstanding of what words mean. You brought race into the equation, yet again, when it is nothing but your sad little lynchpin.

You keep showing you don't know what bigotry means, maybe take a break from this

Again, not remotely concerned with your definitions. They are shaped by your upbringing as opposed to a dictionary, which is fine by me.

Al-Qaeda is a minority of Islam, dumbass. How stupid are you?

100% of Muslims are Muslims. You're being willfully ignorant here.


24 years is a long time, and it seems you simply didn't understand the explanation

Hmm, yet I hear your brothers to this day chirping about things that happened almost two centuries ago. You are openly willing to ignore simple facts and decry them as problematic, which is a massive red flag.
 
It highlights your misunderstanding of what words mean. You brought race into the equation, yet again, when it is nothing but your sad little lynchpin.
You were defending judging all Muslims based on the actions of a few. I said we don't do that with white people and the Holocaust. You said that's race, not religion. I said (and continue to say) that doesn't change a thing about what I said. And you still don't get it lol
Again, not remotely concerned with your definitions. They are shaped by your upbringing as opposed to a dictionary, which is fine by me.
Tell me what dictionary says bigotry based on religion is more acceptable than bigotry based on race
100% of Muslims are Muslims. You're being willfully ignorant here.
100% of white Europeans are white Europeans. You're not too bright.
Hmm, yet I hear your brothers to this day chirping about things that happened almost two centuries ago. You are openly willing to ignore simple facts and decry them as problematic, which is a massive red flag.
Idiots saying bigotry is good and courageous if it's based on religion are the only "red flags" here
 
We were all (hopefully) raised to believe that racism is bad, and the argument today is that it's okay to employ those same racist and prejudiced attitudes toward Muslims. In fact, you're "spineless" if you AREN'T openly prejudiced. Stunning that this is a real conversation
Endorsing a guy who wants to tax “white neighborhoods”.

Racism or tolerated racism?
 
  • Like
Reactions: SpaceCoastVol
You were defending judging all Muslims based on the actions of a few. I said we don't do that with white people and the Holocaust. You said that's race, not religion. I said (and continue to say) that doesn't change a thing about what I said. And you still don't get it lol

Drawing parallels works better when you compare apples to apples. You chose to bring a race into things, either A) as you are wont to do or B) because you can't comprehend the difference between race and religion, which simply has no bearing on how victims (in this case, a city) should respond to assailants (in this case, a religion).

Tell me what dictionary says bigotry based on religion is more acceptable than bigotry based on race

We're very clearly discussing your definition of the word "bigotry," a word you again still struggle to explain. Facts aren't bigoted, buddy.

100% of Muslims are Muslims. You're being willfully ignorant here.

Your reading comprehension, unsurprisingly, fails you here. Muslims were a minority in NYC on 9/11/01, which is precisely why the response/reaction is rationally different than when the perpetrators represent a majority.


Idiots saying bigotry is good and courageous if it's based on religion are the only "red flags" here

You can scream until you're blue in the face, but you've yet to explain how a simple fact has been "distorted" in any capacity.
 
@NashVol11 sorry for arguing and going back and forth earlier...
No matter who is right, it's not changing anything to make my life better.
I'm going to stick to criticizing the Defense and lobbying for Tim Banks to get a head coaching job.
I don't want people to dislike me and I don't want to dislike people on this Website.
There's simply no winning outcome from arguing and bashing the other side on a sports forum.
I just think it'll be better for me to stick to sports here. NYC can do what they please, I'll never live nor visit that city.
-Go Vols
 
  • Like
Reactions: W.TN.Orange Blood
Drawing parallels works better when you compare apples to apples. You chose to bring a race into things, either A) as you are wont to do or B) because you can't comprehend the difference between race and religion, which simply has no bearing on how victims (in this case, a city) should respond to assailants (in this case, a religion).
Bigotry is bigotry. That is apples to apples. You pretended it wasn't because it's inconvenient for your argument.
We're very clearly discussing your definition of the word "bigotry," a word you again still struggle to explain. Facts aren't bigoted, buddy.
More projection, very funny when you keep trying to distinguish between bigotry based on race vs. religion when neither is any better than the other
Your reading comprehension, unsurprisingly, fails you here. Muslims were a minority in NYC on 9/11/01, which is precisely why the response/reaction is rationally different than when the perpetrators represent a majority.
The idea that bigotry is "rational" when it's against a minority might be the dumbest idea ever suggested on this site
You can scream until you're blue in the face, but you've yet to explain how a simple fact has been "distorted" in any capacity.
9/11 being committed by a handful of Muslims doesn't say anything about Islam or Muslims at large. The idea that "it was a Muslim" means something about all other Muslims is dishonest and stupid. I'm not the one screaming and I'm certainly not the one spending all day Sunday talking about why discriminating against Muslims is actually good
 
Bigotry is bigotry. That is apples to apples. You pretended it wasn't because it's inconvenient for your argument.

More projection, very funny when you keep trying to distinguish between bigotry based on race vs. religion when neither is any better than the other

The idea that bigotry is "rational" when it's against a minority might be the dumbest idea ever suggested on this site

9/11 being committed by a handful of Muslims doesn't say anything about Islam or Muslims at large. The idea that "it was a Muslim" means something about all other Muslims is dishonest and stupid. I'm not the one screaming and I'm certainly not the one spending all day Sunday talking about why discriminating against Muslims is actually good

You’re the biggest bigot here.
 
@NashVol11 sorry for arguing and going back and forth earlier...
No matter who is right, it's not changing anything to make my life better.
I'm going to stick to criticizing the Defense and lobbying for Tim Banks to get a head coaching job.
I don't want people to dislike me and I don't want to dislike people on this Website.
There's simply no winning outcome from arguing and bashing the other side on a sports forum.
I just think it'll be better for me to stick to sports here. NYC can do what they please, I'll never live nor visit that city.
-Go Vols
Nash just likes to argue.
 
Bigotry is bigotry. That is apples to apples. You pretended it wasn't because it's inconvenient for your argument.

More projection, very funny when you keep trying to distinguish between bigotry based on race vs. religion when neither is any better than the other

The idea that bigotry is "rational" when it's against a minority might be the dumbest idea ever suggested on this site

9/11 being committed by a handful of Muslims doesn't say anything about Islam or Muslims at large. The idea that "it was a Muslim" means something about all other Muslims is dishonest and stupid. I'm not the one screaming and I'm certainly not the one spending all day Sunday talking about why discriminating against Muslims is actually good

All of this circles back to your inability to understand or define the word "bigotry." Muslims were responsible for 9/11, recognizing this and harboring concern about the Religion of Peace is not a problem for anyone who isn't a total pushover.
 
All of this circles back to your inability to understand or define the word "bigotry." Muslims were responsible for 9/11, recognizing this and harboring concern about the Religion of Peace is not a problem for anyone who isn't a total pushover.
"You don't understand bigotry. Also, bigotry against Muslims is actually good, and if you're not bigoted you're a pushover" lmao ok
 
Advertisement













Back
Top